برچسب: Weapons

  • Weapons | Freakier Friday | Freaky Friday (2003)

    Weapons | Freakier Friday | Freaky Friday (2003)


    Orange background with white text "TRUTH & MOVIES" at top. Strip of film stills below showing five women characters. Yellow circular badge bottom right.

    On Truth & Movies this week, we discuss new releases Weapons and Freakier Friday and revisit Freaky Friday for Film Club.

    Joining host Leila Latif are Hannah Strong and Billie Walker.

     

    Truth & Movies is the podcast from the film experts at Little White Lies, where along with selected colleagues and friends, they discuss the latest movie releases. Truth & Movies has all your film needs covered, reviewing the latest releases big and small, talking to some of the most exciting filmmakers, keeping you across important industry news, and reassessing great films from days gone by with the Truth & Movies Film Club.

     

    Email: truthandmovies@tcolondon.com

    BlueSky and Instagram: @LWLies

     

    Produced by TCO



    Source link

  • WEAPONS (2025) Review: Lessons Learned


    Introduction

    How did you feel about the 2022 movie Barbarian? You can read what I thought of Barbarian in detail, but to summarize, I was not amused. Weapons is the second film solely written and directed by Zach Cregger, Barbarian being his first. Knowing that, I set my expectations for Weapons to…very guarded.

    My hope going into Weapons was that it wasn’t going to be gross and disturbing the way Barbarian was. I was also looking forward to Josh Brolin. I’m happy to report that Weapons was only a tiny bit gross and a tiny bit disturbing, but in the best way possible. Also, Josh Brolin was excellent, and the film was orders of magnitude better than the overrated Barbarian.

    Before I go on, this is a great time to reiterate one of my rules for movies. Do not watch full movie trailers. No exceptions. Part of the fun of watching movies is being surprised by what you see. But trailers always show way too much of the movie, including many of the best parts.

    Weapons
    Josh Brolin stars in “Weapons” (2025). Photo courtesy of Warner Bros. Pictures.

    I know there are some people out there who like the anticipation of wondering when certain parts they saw in a trailer will show up in the movie. But those people don’t realize how much of the movie they’re not fully absorbing due to that same anticipation taking up part of their concentration.

    I bring this up because Weapons is one of the best mystery and horror movies I’ve seen in a long time. Maybe ever. Yeah…it’s that good. And the trailers will rob you of some of that experience. Don’t worry, I didn’t watch the trailer until after I saw the film.

    Synopsis

    All I knew going into Weapons was the synopsis – seventeen kids from the same classroom all disappear, and only one is left. Oh, and I knew Josh Brolin was in it. If you need more than those two things to be very interested in this film – and the Josh Brolin part is optional – you and I cannot hang out.

    (Side note: Teasers for movies are perfectly acceptable to watch because they are essentially the synopsis come to life. You’re welcome.)

    Cregger definitely learned all the right lessons from Barbarian and implemented improvements in Weapons. The structure of the film is the most obvious. Cregger is definitely a fan of nonlinear narratives, showing the same period of time or the same events through different characters’ perspectives. Think Pulp Fiction or Go. When done right, this structure serves to move the plot forward while also spending ample time developing characters. Unlike in Barbarian, all of these components are done right.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OpThntO9ixc

    In Weapons, the film opens with a child narrating the synopsis while showing us the kids running out of their houses and disappearing into the night. Once the setup is complete, a title card reading “Justine” appears, and we get a chunk of the story from Justine’s (Julia Garner) perspective. After spending some time getting to know Justine, revealing more of the main story, and meeting several other characters, the film cuts to a new title card reading “Arthur.”

    Arthur (Brolin) is the father of one of the missing kids, and he wants answers. Character development happens, more story, more character intersections, next title card. Lather, rinse, repeat for police officer Paul (Alden Ehrenreich), drug addict James (Austin Abrams), school principal Andrew (Benedict Wong), and the last remaining student from Justine’s class, Alex (Cary Christopher).

    Discussion

    As we get the various character perspectives, the film does an excellent job of introducing questions early, then answering those questions later. All in service of a dramatic buildup culminating in the various arcs dovetailing together in a very, very excellent climax.

    During all of this, we get served the exact right amount of scares using various techniques. A couple of jump scares, a pinch of witchcraft, a dash of gore, and splashes of creepy imagery, including Alex’s Aunt Gladys (Amy Madigan). It’s a horror mystery recipe so well-crafted it would make Alfred Hitchcock and Agatha Christie cry in delight.

    As if all that wasn’t enough, Cregger also managed to fit in some exquisitely timed moments of comic relief to break up the tension. Various characters sum up these moments nicely, uttering the phrase “what the fuck?!” several times to voice what the audience is thinking at the same time.

    Weapons
    Julia Garner stars in “Weapons” (2025). Photo courtesy of Warner Bros. Pictures.

    Conclusion

    One of my hopes every year is that a movie comes out of nowhere to blow my expectations out of the water. Weapons is definitely that movie this year, a movie so good that an excellent Josh Brolin performance was approximately the tenth best thing about this movie.

    Rating: Don’t ask for any money back, and don’t watch another trailer ever again.

    More from Cinema Scholars

    SCREAM VI: There Are Rules Here? Oh No…There Are No Rules Here

    PUNCH: Actor Jordan Oosterhof Talks About His New Sports/Drama

    Keep up with Cinema Scholars on social media. Like us on Facebook, subscribe on YouTube, and follow us on Threads, Instagram, and Bluesky





    Source link

  • Weapons – Review

    Weapons – Review


    Following the breakout success of Barbarian, writer / director Zach Cregger returns with a more ambitious, more fractured, and far more disturbing vision. Weapons is a kaleidoscopic descent into grief, rage, and the cyclical numbness of American tragedy, told through a town unravelling in the wake of unspeakable violence. It’s a film that doesn’t just want to scare you – it wants to haunt you.

    The film unfolds in chapters (Justine, Archer, Paul, Marcus, James and Alex) each offering a different perspective on the same horrifying event. At the centre is Alex, a bullied elementary school kid, whose quiet suffering appears to take on a metaphor for something truly dark. The narrative spirals outward from him, capturing the ripple effects on a community already fractured by addiction, dysfunction and denial. The story is nonlinear, disorienting and purposefully opaque, but the emotional through line is unmistakable: something terrible has happened … and everyone is complicit in ignoring the signs.

    The ensemble cast is uniformly excellent, but Julia Garner, as teacher Justine, stands out with a performance that’s raw, unpredictable and magnetic. It’s her summer at the box office, and Weapons proves she’s not just riding a wave, she’s steering it. Each actor brings a lived-in weariness to their role: Paul (Alden Ehrenreich) and James (Austin Abrams), both addicts, are twitchy and volatile; Justine, with her DUIs and disciplinary record, is brittle and defensive. Josh Brolin’s Archer keeps making mistakes at work and is only too happy to raise his voice and demand answers. Cary Christopher’s Alex is vulnerable but trying to be brave whilst Scarlett Sher’s voiceover adds a creepy edge to proceedings. 

    Weapons Zach Cregger Film

    Cregger’s visual language is deeply unsettling. He’s clearly inspired by The Shining, dark corridors, disoriented angles, and creeping dread, but he’s also developed his own signature style. The camera often swings wildly, pulls back, then inches forward, keeping viewers perpetually off-balance. There’s a masterful use of negative space: you know something awful is just out of frame, lurking in the shadows. One standout moment mirrors Barbarian as Justine scans her street with an over-the-shoulder shot, leaving you to feel terrified and off kilter from the offset. 

    The soundscape is a character in itself. A low hum permeates the film, vibrating with unease. At times, the silence is so profound you can hear your own pulse. This auditory minimalism amplifies the horror: when the violence comes, it’s deafening. The score acts as an embodiment of grief, dread and the eerie calm before the storm.

    Weapons is rich with metaphor. Gladys (Amy Madigan), a spectacularly Lynchian figure who arrives in bright, warm clothes before decaying into a grey, balding husk, is a manifestation of grief-fuelled rage. Her chilling line, “I can make them hurt each other. I can make them eat each other if I choose”, isn’t just supernatural menace; it’s a reflection of how trauma metastasises in communities. The triangle motif and the bell marked with a 6 subtly nod to the six chapters, suggesting a ritualistic structure to the chaos.

    Weapons Zach Cregger Film

    The shadow of a gun appears twice: once from Alex’s ceiling fan, once in the clouds above his house, visual cues that violence is omnipresent, even when unspoken. The children leaving their homes at 2:17 a.m. ties directly to the police code for assault with intent to murder, and the 217 votes that passed the Assault Weapons Ban in 2022. Cregger has left nothing to coincidence. 

    The film doesn’t rely on jump scares. Cregger’s horror is psychological, atmospheric and deeply human. The violence, when it erupts, is brutal but never gratuitous. It’s the emotional violence (the disbelief of parents, the bullying, the quiet suffering) that lingers. The town is literally mad with grief and the film captures that descent with terrifying clarity. Gladys literally sprints and screams through mundane domestic scenes, cutting grass, eating breakfast, only for life to resume moments later. It’s a chilling metaphor for the “shock, thoughts and prayers, then back to normality” cycle of school shootings. The film doesn’t offer easy answers, but it does offer a mirror. And what it reflects is horrifying.

    Zach Cregger has cemented himself as one of the most exciting voices in horror. Weapons is a bold, unflinching film that refuses to comfort. It’s brilliantly paced, thematically rich and emotionally devastating. If Barbarian was a surprise hit, Weapons is a statement. Cregger has plenty to say and he’s not afraid to say it in the darkest, most daring ways possible.

    Weapons is in UK cinemas now.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OpThntO9ixc

     

    Mary Munoz
    Latest posts by Mary Munoz (see all)



    Source link

  • Weapons review – fun but familiar horror hijinks

    Weapons review – fun but familiar horror hijinks



    If you’ve been to the cinema in the past few months, specifically to watch a horror film, you might have seen an intriguing teaser for Zach Cregger’s sophomore film, Weapons, in which a child’s voice recalls the night that 17 children – all from the same third grade class – disappeared in the small town of Maybrook, Pennsylvania. At 2.17am, they silently got out of bed, left their homes, ran off into the night, and they never came back” leaving only ominous security footage and devastated parents in their wake. Warner Bros capitalised on this creepy premise (and Cregger’s breakout success with Barbarian) through a mysterious marketing campaign – de rigueur for any self-respecting modern horror – setting Weapons up to be the scare of the summer. 

    With a class of kids missing, suspicion falls to their teacher, Justine Gandy (Julia Garner), an unassuming blonde with big glasses who is just as disturbed by the disappearance as the rest of the town. Leading the witch hunt against her is Archer (Josh Brolin), the father of one of the missing children, who is dead certain Matthew’s teacher knows more than she’s letting on despite any evidence to support this (we have no reason to distrust Gandy beyond her functioning alcoholism). There is one lead, in the form of the only pupil from the class who didn’t disappear, but Alex (Cary Christopher) isn’t talking, and the small-town cops are in way over their heads. Well-meaning Principal Marcus (Benedict Wong) appeases the parents by letting Justine go, and with nothing left to lose, the teacher starts looking into the disappearance herself.

    Get more Little White Lies

    The same spiky sense of humour Cregger displayed in Barbarian returns in Weapons, even kicked up a notch – there are striking moments of absurdity and physical comedy that undercut some of the more visceral unpleasantness (Cregger has an eye for the unsettling). Garner’s pleasingly undone performance as a woman on the brink of losing everything is nicely matched by Brolin’s gruff concerned father despite the thinness of both roles, though it’s Amy Madigan who steals the show when she pops up in the third act, even if her character is woefully undercooked. This lack of finesse speaks to a problem that Cregger also exhibited in Barbarian: he’s got style, a sense of humour and good casting instincts, but often the ideas in his films are more interesting than how he manages to realise them.

    For example: there was speculation prior to Weapons’ release that the film might be an allegory for America’s ongoing failure to reckon with the epidemic of school shootings that have plagued the country for decades. While there is some evidence to support this in the film (an exchange between Justine and Archer, a striking but unexplained image Archer sees in his dreams) the imagery is a flimsy gesture rather than a meaningful statement, muddled in with a small-town witch hunt and a side plot involving a local cop’s run-in with a homeless drug addict. The peaks and troughs of the narrative are perhaps a side effect of its chapter structure, which shows the story from the perspective of various characters. Some are excellent, such as the one about left-behind pupil Alex, but others feel a little like filler material.

    The approach has method – in pre-release interviews, Cregger revealed Paul Thomas Anderson’s Magnolia was a big influence on Weapons, in that a cast of characters are bound by one common event, and we see the story unfold from each of their perspectives. Such a bold statement inevitably sets a filmmaker up for failure, and Cregger seems to have forgotten the thing that made Magnolia so great was the originality of PTA’s vision. Rather egregiously, the big reveal of Weapons is incredibly similar to that of Barbarian, and once you notice that striking rehash, it’s impossible to ignore other echos within the film which feel less like stylistic hallmarks and more like lazy fallbacks. His tendency to leave more questions than answers doesn’t help in that area – while there’s often nothing more disconcerting than the unknown, it becomes an easy way out when your ideas are already spookily similar to ones you peddled last time around.

    It’s a shame that the film falls back on old ideas, because Weapons’ first half is genuinely intriguing and some of the film’s scares are effective in both shock value and bewilderment. It’s clear that Cregger has a cinematic spark, and his sick sense of humour is most welcome in these trying times, but two films in, it’s time to find a new bogeyman.





    Source link