برچسب: the

  • Why Investing in Your Business Is Always the Smartest Move — Every Movie Has a Lesson

    Why Investing in Your Business Is Always the Smartest Move — Every Movie Has a Lesson



    No matter the size or stage of your company, one thing remains true: a business that fails to invest in itself risks falling behind. Whether you’re improving customer experience, upgrading equipment, or streamlining operations, smart investments lay the foundation for long-term success and stability.


    1. First Impressions Matter: Post and Rope Barriers for Professionalism

    Whether you’re running a showroom, a dealership, an event space, or a retail store, how your space is presented plays a crucial role in customer perception. Something as simple as a post and rope barrier can help you create a polished, well-organised environment.

    These barriers aren’t just for crowd control—they’re tools for shaping customer flow, directing attention, and enhancing brand presentation. They offer:

    • A more premium look: Compared to standard retractable belts, rope barriers (especially with polished posts) convey a more high-end, thoughtful aesthetic. \

    • Better organisation: Use them to guide visitors, separate VIP areas, or mark off restricted zones. \

    • Improved safety and flow: Clear pathways reduce confusion and help manage crowds during busy periods or events. \

    In short, something as practical as a post and rope barrier helps you show that your business values structure, professionalism, and the customer experience.


    2. Performance Matters: Motorcycle Throttles and Product Quality

    If your business deals in motor parts, vehicles, or engineering solutions, product performance is everything. Take the motorcycle throttle—a component that must offer precision, durability, and responsiveness. Whether you manufacture, distribute, or install motorcycle parts, investing in high-quality throttles means investing in your reputation.

    When your customers depend on your products to deliver safety and performance, cutting corners is not an option. High-quality motorcycle throttles are:

    • More reliable: Reducing the chance of malfunction, which in turn builds customer trust. \

    • Longer-lasting: Durable materials and superior craftsmanship mean fewer returns and happier clients. \

    • Aligned with brand values: Selling premium components supports your positioning as a professional, trustworthy provider. \

    By prioritising reliable, well-made products, you’re not just protecting your bottom line—you’re reinforcing your brand identity in a competitive market.


    3. Long-Term Thinking: The Benefits of Strategic Investment

    Here’s what happens when you consistently invest in your business:

    • Improved efficiency: Better tools, smarter layouts, and well-trained staff all reduce wasted time and resources. \

    • Higher customer satisfaction: Thoughtful upgrades make interactions smoother, faster, and more enjoyable. \

    • Brand loyalty: Customers are more likely to return to businesses that evolve, stay relevant, and maintain high standards. \

    • Greater resilience: Businesses that reinvest profits into equipment, marketing, and training are better equipped to weather economic downturns or industry changes. \

    Every choice you make can make a difference. These aren’t just purchases; they’re part of a bigger picture of growth, trust, and professionalism.


    4. Smart Investment Doesn’t Always Mean Big Spending

    Importantly, investing in your business doesn’t have to mean major financial risk. Small, consistent upgrades often produce better long-term results than sporadic large expenses. From improving signage and displays to enhancing your product range, it’s the ongoing commitment to improvement that sets successful businesses apart.



    Source link

  • The Adrenaline-Addicted, Scalpel-Wielding Screenplay Surgeon — Every Movie Has a Lesson

    The Adrenaline-Addicted, Scalpel-Wielding Screenplay Surgeon — Every Movie Has a Lesson



    By Michael McKown

    Hooray for Hollywood – except when a film script has holes a thousand feet deep, the characters are one-dimensional, the director is pacing the set while muttering about “vision” and the studio suits are sweating bullets. Worse? The movie is shooting at the time the problems are identified.

    If you had, let’s say, a construction project that had to be stopped at a cost of hundreds of thousands of dollars a day, you’d be sweating bullets, too. I’m Michael McKown, co-founder and president of Ghostwriters Central, Inc., a company that doctors defective screenplays. If your script is sabotaging a production, visit and get in touch. Just hit the link to begin.

    Alright, let’s dive into the wild, wonderful world of script doctoring. The script doctor is the industry’s equivalent of a literary ER surgeon, armed with a red pen and a knack for turning a trainwreck into a triumph. Their job? Fix the story, save the day, and do it all without anyone noticing they were there.

    Script doctors don’t get the red-carpet treatment. They’re the ghostwriters of the film world, slipping in to patch up scripts without leaving fingerprints. Think of them as the cleanup crew after a narrative hurricane. Take the late Carrie Fisher — yep, Princess Leia herself, as a prime example.

    Fisher was a go-to script doctor in the ‘90s, polishing dialogue for films like Hook and Sister Act. She’d swoop in, sprinkle her witty fairy dust on clunky lines, and make characters sound like actual humans. But here’s the kicker: she rarely got credit. That’s the script doctor’s life. Fix the mess, take a bow in the shadows, and move on to the next crisis.

    The writers’ room, where much of this magic (or madness) happens, is a pressure cooker with a side of ego. Imagine a room full of sleep-deprived writers, producers barking orders, and a director who’s convinced their half-baked idea is Oscar-worthy. It’s less “Kumbaya” and more like herding cats while riding a unicycle.

    Script doctors have to navigate this chaos, balancing the director’s vision with the studio’s demand for a crowd-pleaser. Tony Gilroy, the guy who turned Rogue One: A Star Wars Story into a fan favorite, is a master at this. The film was reportedly a mess before he stepped in, with disjointed scenes and a murky plot. Gilroy reworked the third act, added emotional heft to Jyn Erso’s story, and gave us that gut-punch ending.

    Collaboration in this world is a double-edged sword. On the one hand, you’ve got brilliant minds furiously bouncing ideas around. On the other, you’ve got too many cooks in the kitchen, each with their own recipe for success. Script doctors need the diplomacy of a UN ambassador. They’re not just rewriting; they’re managing personalities. Take Joss Whedon, who’s doctored scripts for films like Speed and X-Men.

    For Speed, he sharpened the dialogue to make Keanu Reeves’ Jack Traven sound like a cool-headed hero instead of a cardboard cutout. But he also had to deal with a director, Jan de Bont, who was laser-focused on action sequences. Whedon’s job was to make the words pop without stepping on the explosions. It’s like trying to whisper poetry in a rock concert.

    The chaos isn’t just interpersonal, it’s logistical too. Script doctors often work under insane deadlines. Picture getting a call on a Friday saying, “We need a new second act by Monday, and oh, the star wants a love interest now.” That was the reality for John Sayles, who doctored Mimic in the late ‘90s. The studio wanted a horror flick with more heart, so Sayles had to rewrite entire character arcs while the film was already shooting. He described it as “writing on a moving train.” You’re not just fixing a script; you’re doing it while the set’s being built, actors are rehearsing, and the budget’s ballooning.

    It’s enough to make anyone’s head spin. I’ve wondered whether there are any old script doctors who are (still) sane.

    And let’s not forget the actors. Some script doctors, like Fisher, were actors themselves, so they know how to write lines that don’t sound like a robot wrote them. Actors often have, ahem, opinions about their characters. When Tom Hanks or Meryl Streep says, “My character wouldn’t say this,” the script doctor’s gotta pivot fast. For The Avengers, Whedon was brought in to make Robert Downey Jr.’s Tony Stark quippier. RDJ’s a walking improv machine, so Whedon had to craft dialogue that matched his vibe while keeping the plot on track.

    (To slightly diverge from the topic at hand, I consider Hanks and Streep to be equal to, or better than, any other film actors in history).

    What makes script doctoring so wild is the stakes. A bad script can tank a $200 million movie. Look at Jurassic Park. Early drafts were a hot mess. There were dinosaurs galore but there was no heart. Steven Spielberg recognized that fact, called in David Koepp to tighten the screws, and Koepp delivered by focusing on the human drama, like Dr. Grant’s bond with the kids. The result? A classic that still gives us goosebumps.

    But Koepp didn’t do it alone; he was in constant huddles with Spielberg and the producers, tweaking scenes as new ideas (or problems) popped up. That’s the script doctor’s dance, part writer, part therapist, part crisis manager.

    The irony? Despite their heroics, script doctors are often invisible. The Writers Guild of America has strict rules about credits, so unless you’re rewriting half the script, your name might not even make the credits’ fine print. It’s a thankless gig sometimes, but the best in the biz thrive on the challenge. They’re not in it for the glory; they’re in it to make stories sing. And when you’re watching a movie that hits all the right notes, chances are a script doctor was in the room, wrangling the chaos to make it happen.

    So next time you’re munching popcorn and marveling at a film’s tight plot or snappy dialogue, spare a thought for the script doctor. They’re the ones who took a script that was circling the drain and turned it into a masterpiece. It’s messy, it’s stressful, and it’s a collaborative circus — but man, do they make it look easy!

    Do they earn their pay? Oh yeah!



    Source link

  • The Cannes Awards 2025 – The Disapproving Swede

    The Cannes Awards 2025 – The Disapproving Swede


    Yesterday, this year’s Cannes Film Festival ended, and the jury, headed by Juliette Binoche, was ready to hand out the Cannes Awards 2025. The Palme d’Or was given to It Was Just an Accident by Jafar Panahi. It was an unexpected choice, and the title could refer to something that happened in the jury, causing it to win the Palme. I watched the film during the Awards ceremony yesterday, and when someone shouted, “Palme D’Or” after the screening, I thought he was referring to his emotions rather than the actual outcome. It is not a bad film, but a rather pedestrian one with a predictable ending. Panahi won the Citizenship Award earlier during the day, which made more sense.

    The Cannes Awards 2025
    Jafar Panahi at the Citizenship Award ceremony.

    The Cannes Awards 2025 biggest mistake

    If the Palme d’Or fell into the wrong hands, that was nothing compared to the mind-boggling decision to give Joachim Trier’s Sentimental Value the Grand Prix. I described why in my review of the film and will not repeat myself here. It is the weirdest decision this side of Anatomy of a Fall. The festival’s three best films were not forgotten but landed minor awards. Sirát by Oliver Laxe and Sound of Falling by Mascha Schilinski shared the Jury Prize or rather got one each. Both would have been more worthy winners of the two top awards.

    Mascha Schilinski Cannes
    Mascha Schilinski at the Winners’ Press Conference at Cannes 2025.

    The same goes for The Secret Agent by Kleber Mendonça Filho. However, that it missed out on the two top awards is acceptable since it won both the Best Director award as well as Best Actor for Wagner Moura. If anything, that film is characterised by its superb direction and Moura’s performance. The latter was not present at the award ceremony since he was shooting a film in London. However, the director called him during the following press conference.

    The Best actress award went to Nadia Melliti in La petite dernière by Hafsia Herzi. I chose not to watch it. The prize for Best Screenplay went to the Dardenne Brothers, and it was the ninth award for their films, including acting awards. They were part of the 1999 edition when they and Bruno Dumont won almost everything, prompting one of Cannes’ most significant rule changes ever. Finally, a Special Award was given to Bi Gan’s Resurrection—a film that sadly failed to live up to its promise or premise.

    Un Certain Regard

    The main prize in the Un Certain Regard section was given to The Mysterious Gaze of the Flamingo by Diego Céspedes. I didn’t manage to watch it. The unfounded rumours floating around on the Croisette that I avoided the film because the title sounded dangerously Angelopoulosian is utterly false. The Jury Prize went to Un Poeta by Simón Mesa Soto. Harry Lighton won the Best Screenplay for Pillion, while the Best Director award went to twin brothers Arab and Tarzan Nasser for Once Upon a Time in Gaza. A film that boasted foley work by Estonian foley artist Anna-Maria Jams (interviewed here).

    The Camera d’or for Best First Feature went to Hassan Hadi for The President’s Cake, screened in the Quinzaine des Cinéastes section. A Special Mention was given to Akinola Davies Jr for My Father’s Shadow.

    Regarding the competition, it was clearly more substantial than the last two years, with three really good films. On the other hand, there were many bad or mediocre films. The worst one I saw was, without a doubt, Eddington. The film was Ari Aster’s Cannes debut but was universally maligned. The biggest disappointment of the fest was Lynne Ramsay’s Die My Love. Jennifer Lawrence is a powerhouse, but apart from that, the film was weak and didn’t even look good. Being a major fan of the director, I hope the film was rushed to Cannes and is not entirely finished. Some reviews hinted at that.

    Stay tuned for reviews of the winners and other films as well.



    Source link

  • Sentimental Value Joachim Trier – The Disapproving Swede

    Sentimental Value Joachim Trier – The Disapproving Swede


    Sentimental Value (Affeksjonsverdi) is the latest film directed by Joachim Trier. It is his first feature since The Worst Film Person in the World, which was screened at the 2021 Cannes Film Festival, and he walked away with a Best Actress Award for Renate Reinsve. The follow-up is a family drama set in Oslo. The story centres on sisters Nora (Renate Reinsve) and Agnes (Inga Ibsdotter Lilleaas), grieving their mother’s death. Their estranged father, Gustav Borg (Stellan Skarsgård), a once-celebrated filmmaker absent for much of their lives, reenters their world with a script for a comeback film to be shot in their family home—a place steeped in generations of memories, including the suicide of Gustav’s mother.

    Gustav offers Nora, a successful stage actress, the leading role in his semi-autobiographical project. Still, she rejects it due to their strained relationship and her own emotional struggles, including stage fright and complicated personal life. Instead, Gustav casts Rachel Kemp (Elle Fanning), a Hollywood star eager to work with a legendary director, to play the role intended for Nora, further complicating family dynamics. Gustav decides to shoot the film in the old family home, where he coaches Rachel about his family’s life, including his wife’s suicide. As the sisters wrestle with grief, old wounds, and their father’s inconvenient resurrection, the film deals with reconciliation attempts, with the family home standing in as a creaky stage for their unresolved drama.

    Sentimental Value Trier
    Renate Reinsve and Inga Ibsdotter Lilleaas in Sentimental Value

    On faut Trier tout

    As loyal readers might remember, I was not entranced by The Worst Person in the World. It even made it to the third spot on my Disapproval list that year, which was topped by Bergman Island. While watching Trier’s new work, my thoughts often drifted to Mia Hansen-Løve’s shipwreck of a film, not only because of the numerous references to Ingmar but also because of the cliché-ridden theme of the absent father who only cares about his art. Something that is unartfully discussed ad nauseam in Bergman Island. The dialogue between Gustav Borg (at least he is not called Isak as in Wild Strawberries) and his former cinematographer echoes the sentiment that artists can’t be bothered by family life.

    Once again, Eskil Vogt co-wrote the script, and once again, it dabbles in nonsensical phrases. The topic is supposedly heavier this time around. While the previous film suddenly threw in cancer to desperately try to add some weight to a fluffy comedy, this time, WWll takes on the same dubious duty here. All in an attempt to make the sad family story rise above the personal. Sentimental Value is quite manipulative, almost Hollywoodian, so Elle Fanning’s presence is not as jarring as it might appear at first sight. She instead acts as an unintended reminder of how superficial the film is behind the glossy surface. The success at the press screening among the American crowd was palpable.

    Joakim Trier
    Joachim Trier with his Grand Prix at the Cannes Film Festival.

    The original title refers to the word affection rather than sentimentality. Of course, the Norwegian (or Swedish) translation of Sentimental Value uses the word affection. It is still worth considering that “affection” in English refers to a more genuine emotion than “sentimentality”, which often refers to an exaggerated or overblown response. The irony is that the English title better describes the film than the original. That goes for the characters as well. Regarding the Bergman references, Trier attempts to add meta-layers not only to the story, but also cinematically. A Persona reference is particularly egregious. A wise man opined that the film feels like it was made by a young film student who just stumbled on Bergman, and I approve.

    Sentimental Value wears its sentiments on its proverbial sleeves. It is heavy-going rather than profound and has nothing important to say about family relationships. The simplistic meta-layers where some scenes, lo and behold, turn out to be scenes from a film being shot is not bound to surprise anyone who has seen more than ten films in their life. That goes, in particular, for the final one. The best thing in the film is the acting. Stellan Skarsgård is magnificent, as always. During the awards press conference, Trier said that the role was written with Skarsgård in mind, and he managed to breathe life into a one-dimensional character. The same goes for Reinsve and Ibsdotter Lilleaas, as the two daughters.

    After a while, you stop asking yourself who is Cries and who is Whispers. It was obvious that the film would win an award, but a Grand Prix is hard to accept in an edition that included Sirat, The Secret Agent, and Sound of Falling. The fact that the film is sentimental is unquestionable, while the value is highly doubtful. Nevertheless, there is no doubt that it will be a formidable commercial success.



    Source link

  • How to Design the Perfect Living Space — Every Movie Has a Lesson

    How to Design the Perfect Living Space — Every Movie Has a Lesson



    Designing the perfect living space is about more than just creating something visually appealing. It is about crafting an environment that supports your lifestyle, enhances your comfort, and contributes to your overall well being. Whether you’re starting with a blank canvas or refreshing a current space, thoughtful design choices can transform any property into a place that truly feels like home.

    From choosing the right location to selecting furniture and sustainable features, here are some of the most effective ways to create a living space that blends practicality with style.

    Start With Location and Layout

    Before diving into interiors, it helps to look at the bigger picture. Your home’s location and layout influence not only how your space functions but also how it feels to live there day to day.

    If you’re in the market for a new home, consider exploring areas that offer both charm and potential. For example, houses for sale in Worsthorne provide an ideal setting for those seeking countryside tranquillity with a strong sense of community. Once you’ve found the right location, you can begin designing your space to reflect your personal taste and practical needs.

    Sustainable Solutions for Modern Living

    Sustainable design has become a key consideration for modern homeowners. It’s not just about being eco-friendly but also about creating a comfortable, efficient living environment that saves money and supports your health.

    One element that can make a significant difference is how you manage natural light and heat. Installing passivhaus blinds is a smart solution for improving energy efficiency. These specialised blinds work by regulating the indoor temperature, reducing the need for heating in winter and cooling in summer. They also add a sleek, minimalist look that complements a wide variety of interior styles.

    If you’re updating or building your space with energy performance in mind, this is one investment worth making.

    Stylish Interiors Without the Long-Term Commitment

    Creating a beautifully furnished home does not always require buying everything outright. Whether you’re staging a property, decorating a temporary home, or testing a new look, luxury furniture rental can be a perfect solution.

    This option allows you to access premium furniture and accessories without the upfront cost. From statement sofas to elegant dining sets, these rentals let you elevate your interiors instantly. It’s particularly useful if you want to enjoy stylish living while maintaining the flexibility to refresh your space as trends and needs evolve.

    Luxury furniture rental also takes the pressure off when designing a new space, giving you room to experiment with layouts and styles before making permanent decisions.

    Create Flow and Functionality

    Design is not only about how your space looks but also how it works. Think about the way you use each room and how the layout supports your daily routines. Functional design should allow for ease of movement, logical storage, and adaptable zones. A well-organised home helps reduce stress and improves how you feel in the space. When everything has a place and purpose, day-to-day living becomes smoother and more enjoyable.



    Source link

  • The Worst Mistakes Parents Can Make When It Comes To Screen Time — Every Movie Has a Lesson

    The Worst Mistakes Parents Can Make When It Comes To Screen Time — Every Movie Has a Lesson



    # 1 – Enforcing Complete Screen Time Bans

    There’s so much discussion around screen time and its potential harm that many parents may be tempted to enforce complete bans on this kind of activity. Removing screens means removing the problem, right? Or perhaps not. 

    Teens, in particular, are unlikely to stop a behaviour simply because their parents want them to. In this instance, screen time bans can prove more harmful as they result in secretive screen activity that’s entirely out of your knowledge or control. 

    Equally, complete screen time bans from a young age can result in the glamorization, or overuse, of screens as those children get older. Banning screens altogether also prevents children from understanding essentials to modern living, such as healthy, screen smart behaviours, and even the ability to access online benefits like personalized learning.

    Nowadays, it’s also true that entirely banning your child from screens can leave them isolated from classmates or friendship groups, resulting in inevitable resentments and potential social difficulties both in and outside of school. For all of these reasons and more, management is always better than complete restriction, as it allows children to benefit from screens in an open, overseen way that keeps parents in control at all times. 

    # 2 – A Lack of Age-Appropriate Parental Controls

    Parental controls on each of your child’s devices are by far the best ways to ensure they don’t encounter inappropriate content online. These controls can manage everything from how long and when your child can access the internet, to which sites they’re able to access during that time. Most parents understand the importance of putting these controls in place before handing a device to their child, but many don’t take enough precautions to make sure that these controls are effective or age-appropriate.

    Even basic parental controls will be sufficient for younger children who, up until the age of at least five, should also be supervised while using screens. However, ill-thought or poorly managed parental controls can quickly come under fire as tech-savvy children reach their pre-teen and teen years. Not to mention that, at this age, strict restrictions could be as bad as complete bans for encouraging secretive use, or even hidden devices that you don’t know about. 

    The best way to overcome this is to continually review parental controls, ensuring that they provide age-appropriate restrictions and a strong enough defence to resist wise teenagers. As your children get older, it’s also worth speaking with them about restrictions that they may find problematic, and adjusting your approach to give them more overall control of their online activities, without entirely removing your much-needed oversight. 

    # 3 – Failing to Guide Usage



    Source link