برچسب: Frédéric

  • What Marielle knows by Frédéric Hambalek Mid at Best

    What Marielle knows by Frédéric Hambalek Mid at Best


    What Marielle Knows (Was Marielle weiß) is the sophomore feature by Frédéric Hambalek (interviewed here) and one of only two German films in the Berlinale competition. The other was Yunan. At the heart of What Marielle Knows is a seemingly ordinary suburban family thrown into chaos by an extraordinary twist. Julia (played by Julia Jentsch) and Tobias (Felix Kramer), a moderately content couple navigating the routines of professional life, discover that their 12-year-old daughter, Marielle (Laeni Geiseler), has inexplicably developed telepathic abilities following a playground altercation. Suddenly, Marielle can see and hear everything her parents do—whether at work, in the car, or behind closed bedroom doors. How will Marielle’s sudden abilities affect the family dynamics?

    Hambalek has explained that the initial inspiration for this film came a few years back when someone
    showed him a baby monitor with a built-in camera, which was a brand new thing back then. He felt something was wrong with it and asked himself what would happen if you reversed that power dynamic. What would parents do if they were somehow monitored by their kids? Another factor is how children regard their parents. Normally, they see their parents as demigods until they start growing up and gradually see their weaknesses. In this case, Marielle will get an instant crash course on all of this, breaking some of her illusions. The telepathy factor was merely a way to avoid technological distractions.

    What Marielle Knows
    Felix Kramer and Julia Jentsch in What Marielle Knows.

    What Marielle Knows about Nordic gender roles

    What Marielle Knows has been labelled a comedy, and there was plenty of laughter during the press screening. Something that surprised me and the sentiment was echoed by the director, who was surprised that the premiere audience laughed as much as they did. Substantial portions of the film follow the parents in their respective workplaces. Julia is flirting with her co-worker, Max, during illicit cigarette breaks, and their conversation is sexually charged. Meanwhile, Tobias, who works at a publishing house, sees his power (manhood?) challenged by his co-worker Sören, who does everything he can to provoke Tobias. Since the film is from 2025, the gender parts are quite obvious, not least from a Nordic perspective.

    While discussing the film after the press screening, several German colleagues stressed the German aspects of the film, not least concerning the topic of privacy. Germany is famously worried about being under surveillance and watched over. If I had a Euro for every time a person from Berlin lectured me about the perils of credit cards, I would be a very rich man. When I asked the director about this, he rejected the notion that the topics were particularly German and opined that the issue of privacy is more universal than that. The Funkloch issue aside, I agree since I felt that several characteristics of the film felt quite Nordic.

    Interview with Frédéric Hambalek
    What Marielle Knows

    The film’s locations are largely minimalistic, especially the workplaces, but also the family’s home. There are lots of open spaces, and when the space is closed, it is by a window rather than a wall. The director said that he wanted to get away from the clichés of observing through glass panes and rather stressed the intimate space created by close-ups. That is a welcome idea and shows that Hambalek is aware of the potential pitfalls of his concept. Still, my mind often wandered to recent Nordic films such as The Hypnosis and the films of Ruben Östlund.

    This might sound like a sad triangle, but Hambalek mentioned Turist (Force majeure) as a film he watched during the production, still stressing the formal differences between the films. I agree wholeheartedly with the director about those differences, but I still couldn’t shake a pronounced feeling of deja vu while watching What Marielle Knows. We don’t get to know much about the titular character since she is primarily a catalyst for the action. In several ways, the film is a treatise on the topic of the Observer effect. That will be particularly evident during the film’s latter part, in which some of the parents’ actions feel performative. It should be said that the acting in the film is uniformly excellent.

    Regarding the point of a child being able to see her parents’ true nature, I was reminded of the classic The Simpsons episode Wild Barts Can’t Be Broken, where the children of Springfield, inspired by a film that is a thinly veiled version of Village of the Damned (1960) realise that they don’t need special powers, but what they already know about their parents is enough to make them uncomfortable. Another connection between the two works is a late reveal that won’t be discussed here. Suffice it to say that What Marielle Knows didn’t bring me any new insights and that it is unfortunate that the titular character is the least explored since she is the most interesting character.



    Source link

  • Interview with Frédéric Hambalek – intriguing

    Interview with Frédéric Hambalek – intriguing


    Frédéric Hambalek’s sophomore feature, What Marielle Knows (Was Marielle weiß), reviewed here, was screened in this year’s Berlinale competition as one of two German films. I was able to interview the director a few days after the premiere.

    I’ve read that you don’t think about genres. When did you realize that this story was a comedy?

    Frédéric Hambalek: I’m still surprised how much people think this is a comedy. I was extremely surprised at the premiere that people were laughing out loud. I knew that the idea had some funny aspects, and I also think that it had some awkward and dark, cringy, dramatic aspects to it. So yes, I probably think it leans a bit more comical, but I never thought this would be read as much as a comedy as they’re doing it right here in Berlinale.

    I’m interested in casting because I think the characters have such good chemistry on screen, which is very important, and they perhaps bring the comedy and the openness of it. Can you talk about that?

    FH: Casting is a bit miraculous; it has so much to do with who is available and who wants to do this. We arrived with Julia Jentsch, who plays the mother first, and I thought she would be very good in this role because she [typically] portrays very likeable characters, and this character is maybe not all that likeable. Then, I could look at people who would fit her, and Felix Kramer was interesting because he would typically play very physical characters. I don’t know if you’ve seen his film [Someday We’ll Tell Each Other Everything], but two years ago at Berlinale, he played this very sexual, male, hands-on guy.

    Marielle featured
    Laeni Geisele as the titular character in What Marielle Knows by Frédéric Hambalek.

    The DIsapproving Swede: After the screening, I talked to German critics who said this story is very German. I know that Germans are very wary of giving their data away and are worried about their privacy. Lots of things are analogue. Do you think that this is a typical German topic?

    FH. I don’t think so at all. I think it translates well to every Western society where we face issues of how open we want to be with our lives. Isn’t it in Norway where you have to show all your taxes, and everybody can see?

    TDS: It’s like that in Sweden as well. You can see anything. People check on each other before dates. I saw an ad from a company selling extra information with the headline, “Check your date before Valentine’s Day”.

    FH: That is incredibly interesting to me. I could not imagine that happening in Germany at all. It sounds a bit funny, though. I could imagine people sweating when they introduced themselves and thinking. Oh, now everybody knows I’m not that person in my presentation.

    The interview with Frédéric Hambalek goes Nordic

    TDS: So if the film felt very German to those German friends I talked to, it felt pretty Nordic to mefor instance, the environment with those minimalistic interiors. I’m wondering if you can talk about the contrast between the home and the office. As far as I’ve read, the publishing office was the only set in the film.

    FH: it was an actual office space, but we transformed it a lot. We were going for very modern places because they are open. You can see everything, they have glass walls and so on. Still, I didn’t want to push too hard on this metaphor. For example, we don’t observe through the glass in the office building, as you would do in a surveillance video. I would always say, “Let’s come up with the camera close and frame them with the camera. Use long lenses, go into a very intimate space and single them out under a very intimidatingly close lens to give the feeling of somebody observing them all the time”.

    TDS: Which camera did you use?

    We used the Alexa 35. And the more we shot, the more we used longer and longer lenses. In the end, it was like 70 or 100-millimeter lenses.

    What Marielle Knows
    Julia Jentsch and Felix Kramer in What Marielle Knows by Frédéric Hambalek.

    TDS: Thinking about the music, why the Razumovsky Quartets? Obviously, they are great pieces of music, but was there a specific reason for that choice?

    FH: I went about it very intuitively. I knew that the music should be there to give you some sense of something that is not completely real, a bit out of this world. I quickly found the first Beethoven piece, which was used in the scene with the slap in slow-mo. It was intuitive that I thought this was the right tone. It has something ironic to me, but also serious.

    TDS: So, the question that every director dreads: Do you have any influences from other directors? Maybe something that takes place in this kind of modern environment.

    The film that made me want to be a director was 2001: A Space Odyssey, which I saw on TV when I was 13. didn’t get it, of course, and I turned it off after an hour because I was so bored. But I could not stop thinking about it. All these Kubrick films really taught me early on that the art form is very free.

    TDS: Nothing specific for this film?

    When pressed on that question, I always thought about Force Majeure by Ruben Östlund just because of how they are acting. You will write this now, but I say it anyway. And I thought, “Look at this film”. I still thought that my film would get away from it in a way. I looked at that film as a way of checking out someone who does something you might think is in the right vein. At the same time, I knew that my film would be formally different.



    Source link