برچسب: Bruno

  • Reflection in a Dead Diamond by Helène Cattet and Bruno Forzani

    Reflection in a Dead Diamond by Helène Cattet and Bruno Forzani


    In 1988, Alex Cox introduced films broadcast on BBC with a segment called Moviedrome. When talking about Diva (1981), he said, “It’s the sort of film that American movie critics like very much because it’s big on style, short on substance, and in French. It’s the kind of film that gets called scintillating or fabulous frothy fun.” He concluded by saying that “it features musical selections from the noted opera, La Wally, un des mes favoris.” I had a recording of the film and that introduction for a long time, and I thought about it after watching Reflection in a Dead Diamond. The first reflection one makes is that American critics have changed significantly since then.

    Reflection in a Dead Diamond (Reflet dans un diamant mort) is the fourth feature film directed by Hélène Cattet and Bruno Forzani. I stress the word directed since their films seriously focus on the cinematic aspects of the medium, which is all too rare nowadays. The film had its world premiere in the Berlinale Competition. It was the couple’s first film in a major competition after their previous two films were premiered at Locarno in the Piazza Grande strand. If I have been hiding behind the statement that favourite films are the most difficult to describe, this one tops them all. Even discussing the beginning and end is perilous when describing this diamond-fashioned narrative.

    Reflection in a Dead Diamond
    Reflection in a Dead Diamond

    Early on, we see the elderly John Diman (Fabio Testi) at a beach on the French Riviera. He watches a girl from a distance. Suddenly, her diamond nipple ring sparkles in the sunlight and seems to trigger a memory in John’s mind that looks suspiciously like a movie ending with the young John (Yannick Renier) on a yacht with a girl and a box of diamonds. Then, some closing credits appear, saying, “C’était Reflet dans un diamant mort”. That text also serves as the opening credits of the film we are watching. What conspires in the remainder of the film is open to interpretation, and anyone looking for a straightforward narrative would be better off watching Mission Impossible (1996).



    During the interview with the directors, they described how they built the story with three narrative lines in different colours. While sticking with the term story, they also stressed that they wanted to tell it with cinematographic means rather than dialogue. Hélène Cattet clearly stated that there is no contrast between the form and the content but that it’s one thing. It is similar to how the Clive Langham quote in Alain Resnais’ and writer David Mercer’s Providence (1977) brushes off the dichotomy between style and feelings. In that film, Clive, an author, makes up a narrative containing family members, but he constantly loses control over it.

    Diamonds are Not Forever

    The most ordinary way to describe the film would be that the ageing John looks back on his former life as a spy at a time when the Côte d’Azur was still a glamorous place rather than the tacky surroundings that greet attendants at the Cannes Film Festival nowadays. However, the film never clarifies whether we witness memories, fantasies, dreams, or all of them mixed up. It is no coincidence that the word diamond appears in the title since it mirrors the film’s complex structure. The usage of the word clarifies might be a tad unjust since the film’s various facets are never muddled or unclear, but how those elements fit together is a different story.

    Cattet Forzani
    Yannick Renier in Reflection in a Dead Diamond

    The directors have pointed to influences like the Eurospy films of the sixties, which tried to compete with the actual James Bond films but with a fraction of their budget. It is not difficult to spot references to Diabolik (1968), for instance. Regarding the structure, Satoshi Kon was mentioned with his kind of 3D narrative. The constant playfulness made me think about the films of Raoul Ruiz, not only Le Temps retrouvé (1999) but also the ones that toy with clichés and where characters suddenly do the most unexpected things. Another film that came to my mind was Ruben Brandt: Collectorwith its irreverent and mischievous references to everything from Infanta Margarita in a Blue Dress to Pulp Fiction.

    In a pivotal scene, young John undergoes a briefing where he learns about the opponents he is about to face. Among them are Serpentik, whom we encounter several times in different shapes and forms (and actresses), but the most dangerous is Kinetik. What makes him so dangerous is that he hypnotises his victims to make them believe that they are in a film. The spell only ends when they see the word fin, marking the end. This is a perfect metaphor for the structure of the film. Maybe parts or all of John’s story drive from this state of consciousness. Also, isn’t this the perfect way to describe what filmmakers wish to achieve with their audience?

    The implications are numerous, and in my mind, this is the core of Reflection in a Dead Diamond. The fractured but beautiful illusion might refer to cinema itself. The Kinetik character alone would warrant a thesis or two. Going back to the beginning (or end) of this review, Alex Cox’s notion about style contra substance, which might have been said in jest, is shattered here into a myriad of crystal-clear diamond facets. His mention of the Diva score is interesting because Cattet and Forzani use not only the same piece of music but also the exact same recording used in Beineix’s film. One giveaway is an introduction that only exists in this version.

    If my description of Reflection in a Dead Diamond makes it sound academic, nothing could be further from the truth. This is not only the directors’ most accomplished film to date but also one of the most thrilling, beautiful, sexy and bewildering works you will likely watch this year. It is indeed “scintillating and fabulous frothy fun.” I wouldn’t mind if I was hypnotised by Kinetik and had to live inside this film for a long time.

    Seen in the Berlinale Competition, where it inexplicably walked away empty-handed.

    Reflection in a Dead Diamond
    Reflection in a Dead Diamond - The Disapproving Swede

    Director:
    Hélène Cattet, Bruno Forzani.

    Date Created:
    2025-04-26 19:58

    Pros

    • Intelligent
    • Endlessly entertaining
    • Cinematography
    • Editing

    Cons

    • Eventually, the film ends.



    Source link

  • Interview with Hélène Cattet and Bruno Forzani

    Interview with Hélène Cattet and Bruno Forzani


    Hélène Cattet and Bruno Forzani presented their fourth film. Reflection in a Dead Diamond in this year’s Berlinale competition. Since it was the most exhilarating film at the festival, I was thrilled to be able to sit down with the couple to discuss this multifaceted work (pun intended).

    The Disapproving Swede: So, the project more or less started with Fabio Testi. Could you talk a bit about that?

    Bruno Forzani: It’s a long story because my mother was a big fan of Fabio Testi, and my sister would have had the name Fabio if she had been a boy. I discovered him through Italian B-movies, and I loved him. He was also in Zulawski’s L’Important, c’est d’aimer; in 2010, we watched Road to Nowhere by Monte Hellman, and Testi’s character reminded us of Sean Connery.

    Hélène Cattet: He was dressed in a white suit. It reminded us about Death in Venice, too. So we thought, “What if we mix those two antagonist universes to create something like a new universe?”

    BF: We also saw a staging of Tosca, the opera, by Christophe Honoré. He treated it like Sunset Boulevard, and that kind of treatment was an inspiration for our film. We wrote the script with Fabio Testi in mind. We managed to meet him and were fascinated by him because we saw his eyes just in front of us, which we had only seen in close-ups in movies. We began to talk about directing actors just through the eyes, and it was the first time we met an actor who was used to that.

    Then, we told him we would shoot on film, and he was surprised and agreed to do the movie. It was great because Fabio synthesized the mix we wanted to do between this Euro spy genre and Death in VeniceHe was in Italian Westerns, but he was in other kinds of films as well, so it was a perfect match.

    Hélène Cattet and Bruno Forzani
    Bruno Forzani, Hélène Cattet and Fabio Testi.

    TDS: When he got the script, his first reaction was that he didn’t understand anything, right?

    BF: Yeah, exactly, but it was the same with Monte Hellman. He did not understand the script, but he trusted him, and when we met him, he trusted us, so voila!

    How do you synthesize all these ideas and different references to build a story, even if it is a story on your own terms? Your films are mostly vibes, so how do you make a story out of this? Is it organic?

    HC: It was really technical this time because we were building the story with different layers of narration. We put one colour for each line of narration, three altogether. Then, we could organize how those layers will interweave and respond to each other. You develop different thematics and different points of view because you can see the movie from different angles. Each spectator can find a way to experience the film so that two spectators can see a different movie. We aim to be playful and create a game for the audience.

    BF: When we write the script, we are writing it technically with detailed descriptions of every detail you will see and hear in the movie. It is not typical since we live in a French-speaking culture, and the cinema world is more literate than cinematic.

    HC: We really want to tell the story using cinematographic means, not through dialogue.

    TDS: You call it storytelling. Is the story the most crucial thing, rather than the cinematic expression, or don’t you see a contrast?

    HC: There’s no contrast between the form and the content. It’s one thing. The form tells the story, not the content.

    Reflection in a Dead Diamond
    Reflection in a Dead Diamond.

    Hélène Cattet and Bruno Forzani about Diamond structure

    TDS: When it comes to stylistics, I thought a bit about Raoul Ruiz. You mentioned playfulness, and he had a way of toying with clichés and adding narrative layers in a complex, sometimes crystal structure.

    BF: You are not the first to say that regarding the film’s construction.

    TDS: Gilles Deleuze described Alain Resnais and other directors as having a crystalline structure, but here, we even have a diamond structure where things go through reflections and refractions.

    HC: Exactly!

    BF: Since the beginning, the word diamond was in the title. It wasn’t the same title, but we constructed the film like a diamond because there are several facets.

    HC: Yes, that’s why you can see the movie like a diamond through different prisms.

    TDS: You talked about Op art earlier. You have different art styles in all your films. Can you talk a bit more about the use of op art in this film?

    BF: The film is about illusion because you don’t know if the past of the hero is an illusion or if it’s reality. The past is represented by this horror-spy aesthetic, where you think the world was funny and very pop-like, but the heroes were violent, in fact. It is a fake representation of the world. Since the film is about illusion, the structure is an illusion, too, because of the different layers. Op art was the perfect art to approach the story visually. In fact, when we began to work on the script, we went to Nice. There was a big Op art exhibition there, which inspired us.

    TDS: You mentioned Clozuot’s La Prisionnière. Were there other films using Op art that inspired you as well?

    BF: The funny thing is that the Italian B-movies we mentioned are exploitation movies but use a lot of art and Op art. There is also Mario Caiano’s L’Occhio nel labirinto. James Bond films are another example, like The Man with the Golden Gun, where you have a kind of labyrinth, which is very Op art. It’s a very funny art form since it’s mixed with something very popular.

    TDS: A last, tangential musical question: You use a piece from Catalani’s La Wally [Ebben? Ne andrò lontana], made famous by the film Diva. Isn’t it the exact same recording as in Diva?

    BF: Yes, exactly. In this version, there is an introduction that you don’t have in the original, and I love this introduction. I discovered opera with Diva, and I love that piece.



    Source link