دسته: فیلم‌های آینده و شایعات

  • 12 Classic Movies That Bombed at the Box Office

    12 Classic Movies That Bombed at the Box Office


    These classic movies bombed at the box office despite being recognized today as stone-cold classics.

    We’re defining a movie as a bomb if it failed to make double its budget back in box office returns. A movie generally needs to make at least double its budget to turn a profit, given that the studio must pay for marketing expenses, and share a film’s take with theaters.

    As for what makes a movie a classic — that’s entirely subjective. But we tried to find films around which there’s a wide general consensus.

    Citizen Kane (1941)

    RKO – Credit: C/O

    For years, Citizen Kane reigned as the greatest movie ever made to many, and probably by general consensus. Before you see it, you feel like it could never live up to the hype… and then it does. Orson Welles truly earned the blank check he then used to make half-baked, overly ambitious passion projects for the rest of his life. You make Citizen Kane, you get to do that.

    Of course, you may know the story. Citizen Kane is a thinly-veiled riff on the life of newspaper magnate William Randolph Hearst, who could be described as “not chill” about the idea of a thinly veiled biography/critique. Hearst did his best to destroy Citizen Kane, and in some ways he unfortunately succeeded. Box office reporting in the early 1940s was even less transparent than it is today, but fortunately Citizen Kane is one of the most-researched, most-discussed movies in history.

    From what we glean, the movie made only $1.5 million off of a budget of just over $800,000. It would have been far more widely seen, we suspect, if not for the efforts of Hearst (and/or people seeking favor from him) to bury the film.

    Willy Wonka & the Chocolate Factory (1971)

    Paramount – Credit: C/O

    Gene Wilder is the Willy Wonka to many, despite Tim Burton making Charlie & the Chocolate Factory and Timothee Chalamet starring in a Willy Wonka prequel.

    For the multiple generations raised on Willy Wonka & the Chocolate Factory as a classic, it’s easy to assume it was a hit and has always been considered a must-see. But that is not at all the case. The film failed to grab a golden ticket, initially earning just $4 million at the box office on a budget of $3 million.

    It would take time before the idiosyncratic musical was able to grab the general public.

    It’s a Wonderful Life (1946)

    RKO – Credit: C/O

    You know It’s a Wonderful Life as a holiday classic. It’s been airing during the Christmas season for decades. The movie is cultural wallpaper.

    But would you believe it basically derailed Frank Capra’s career? It’s true. One of the most successful directors of all time bet his reputation on It’s a Wonderful Life, and he lost that bet.

    Capra had started his own production company, Liberty Films, but it ended up only producing two films, in part because It’s a Wonderful Life was so unsuccessful. The movie made $3.3 million, which was only a couple hundred thousand over the budget. Capra’s dream of being a studio magnate died on the vine. He never made another notable movie, in our opinion.

    We will also note there is a misnomer that It’s a Wonderful Life became so popular because its copyright lapsed and networks didn’t have to pay to air it. It’s true that in 1974 National Telefilm Associates lost the copyright to the movie due to a clerical error.

    But because it was based on a pre-existing work, networks still had to pay royalties to air it, and since 1993 one company or another has enforced copyright on the movie thanks to a 1990 Supreme Court ruling.

    It’s also on our list of Black and White Films That Feel Strikingly Modern.

    Blade Runner (1982)

    Warner Bros. – Credit: C/O

    Ridley Scott is both prolific and acclaimed, and Blade Runner is now considered one of the best sci-fi movies ever made. It got a sequel 37 years after its release, thanks entirely to its legacy.

    And yet, despite starring Harrison Ford near the height of his Han Solo/Indiana Jones era, Blade Runner arrived to a lukewarm reception.

    The theatrical cut made $41.8 million on a $30-million budget, thought it has earned more thanks to many recuts and re-releases.

    Clue (1985)

    Paramount – Credit: C/O

    Honestly? Even as longtime Clue fans, dating back to the days when it was a staple of Comedy Central, we’re surprised just how popular the movie has become.

    Clue seems to be one of the most-popular comedy films of the 1980s, thanks to constant twists, a fascinating structure, multiple endings, and a stacked cast that includes Martin Mull, Madeline Kahn, Tim Curry, Christopher Lloyd and Colleen Camp. It even has a cameo by the Go-Gos’ Jane Wiedlin.

    It’s better than any adaptation of a board game should be. In the ‘80s, though, Clue was greeted with utter apathy. It made $14.6 million worldwide on a budget of $15 million. When we hear that well we feel flames… flames on the side of our face.

    Heathers (1989)

    New World Pictures – Credit: C/O

    In hindsight, Heathers was always destined to be, at best, a cult classic. It’s a pitch-dark comedy about teens on a killing spree. Even though we really like Heathers, we also fully understand it not having broad appeal. But it’s hard to argue with its artistic merit — it’s a pitch perfect pitch dark satire of the typical ’80s teen movie.

    That being said, Heathers truly bombed. Winona Ryder was fresh off Beetlejuice, and Christian Slater was a teen heartthrob. Even so, a movie that only cost $3 million to make did not make its budget back. Heathers made a mere $1.1 million. That was fully domestically, as it didn’t get an international release.

    Why were so few people interested? May we suggest a lot of people had brain tumors for breakfast?

    Fight Club (1999)

    20th Century Fox – Credit: C/O

    Fight Club is one of those movies that always seems to be in some state of exhausting discourse. First there were the super fans who didn’t seem to get the movie at all, which begat a lot of people who cast aspersions on anybody who liked Fight Club and then… ugh, we’re exhausted already.

    Let’s skip all that. What we have here is a dark satire from David Fincher that cost around $65 million to make. It was no cheap indie flick, a bold swing given the nature of the plot. Edward Norton and Brad Pitt loved it.

    But perhaps because of its dark and unrelenting subject matter (and very dark humor) the movie made only $101.2 million worldwide.

    In retrospect, of course, its recognized as one of the most influential movies of the last 25 years.

    Office Space (1999)

    20th Century Fox – Credit: C/O

    Office Space is the comedy equivalent of Shawshank Redemption, a movie that became beloved through repeat television airings. The difference is that while Shawshank Redemption wasn’t a blockbuster, it made plenty of money, and was also a Best Picture nominee. Office Space? It made $12.2 million off of a budget of $10 million. The film has made almost that much in DVD and VHS sales over the years.

    With all due respect to Shawshank Redemption, a favorite of many and one time most-popular movie on IMDb, Office Space has had more cultural legacy. It is the defining cinematic work reflecting white-collar office life. It led to Swingline making red staplers. It probably ended T.G.I. Friday’s asking the waitstaff to wear “flair” on their uniforms.

    Office Space hit people in their bones, but not until they found, after its theatrical release..

    Dazed and Confused (1993)

    Gramercy Pictures – Credit: C/O

    Richard Linklater’s 1990 Slacker is one of the most important independent films ever made, kicking off the ’90s indie boom and putting Austin, Texas on the way to becoming the film hub it is today.

    Dazed and Confused mined Linklater’s Texas teenage years to tell an indelible slice-of-life story. It helped solidify him as one of the perhaps the best-ever director of hangout movies.

    Linklater also showed an eye for talent: Ben Affleck, Parker Posey, and Matthew McConaughey are just a few of the then-unknowns that he cast in Dazed and Confused. However, given the movie’s cast, and its many adoring fans (literal books have been written about), it is easy to believe it was a hit.

    Yet on a budget of $6.9 million, Dazed and Confused brought in only $8.2 million. It’s OK: Gen Xers would go one to watch it countless times at home, and Linklater’s next film, the also excellent Before Sunrise, made ten times its $2.5 million budget.

    Helping to launch the careers of Matthew McConaughey and Ben Affleck, among others, Richard Linklater’s Dazed and Confused is a Gen X classic about the cuspers, or busters, who, like Linklater, fall somewhere between Boomers and Gen Xers.

    Quentin Tarantino has called his “favorite movie of the 90s” and “maybe the only movie that three different generations of college students have seen multiple times.” The party at the moontower has never stopped. Alright alright alright.

    The King of Comedy (1982)

    20th Century Fox

    Martin Scorsese and Robert De Niro followed up their 1980 masterpiece Raging Bull with the $19 million King of Comedy, which earned a mere $2.5 million, making it one of the biggest misses of their careers.

    In a wild turn, Todd Phillips’ Joker — which Phillips has called an homage not only to King of Comedy but also to Scorsese and De Niro’s Taxi Driver — earned more than a billion.

    Joker borrows so heavily from King of Comedy that Phillips enlisted De Niro to play a role in Joker much like the one Jerry Lewis played in King of Comedy.

    The Thing (1982)

    Universal – Credit: C/O

    Released the same year as King of Comedy, John Carpenter’s The Thing is now recognized as a masterful work of sci-fi horror, celebrated for truly unnerving atmospherics and practical effects.

    Audiences in 1982 were slow to catch on. Made for $15 million, it earned just $19.9 million domestically.

    The Shawshank Redemption

    Columbia Pictures – Credit: C/O

    This lovely Stephen King adaptation earned only $29 million in its initial release on a budget of $25 million.

    Tell that to the legions of people who have caught it on TNT while flipping through channels and almost always stuck around. It’s a subtle, kindhearted charmer, but has enough of an edge to keep viewers on the edge of their easy chairs

    .Is it a classic? Well, IMDb lists it as the No. 1 movie of all time.

    The Big Lebowski (1998)

    Gramercy Pictures

    An eminently quotable movie so beloved that it spawned a Lebowski Fest and countless last-minute Halloween costumes, The Big Lebowski is among the best regarded films in the Coen brothers astonishing collection.

    Yet somehow it earned just over $19 million domestically on a budget of $15 million.

    If you don’t think it’s a classic, well, that’s just like your opinion, man.

    Like This List of 12 Classic Movies That Bombed at the Box Office?

    Credit: C/O

    You might also like this list of Gen X Movie Stars Gone Too Soon or this list of ‘90s Movies Only Cool Kids Remember, including Dazed and Confused.

    Main image: Clue. Paramount.



    Source link

  • A Surfer, Police Officer, God and Buddha Are Part of NFMLA’s InFocus: Asian Cinema Program

    A Surfer, Police Officer, God and Buddha Are Part of NFMLA’s InFocus: Asian Cinema Program


    A surfer meeting her mother, a discussion of God and Buddha, and a police officer struggling with cultural identity were among the subjects stories in NewFilmmakers Los Angeles’ InFocus: Asian Cinema program and InFocus: Immigration programs.

    The event, which also included the Los Angeles premiere of Laramie Dennis’s debut narrative feature Where In the Hell, began with a collection of films that told stories of immigration, emigration and activism, as well as navigating two cultures and the contemplation of places aspired to and left behind.

    The day continued with a program that spotlighted Asian-American talent and storytelling in front of and behind the camera. It featured themes of family dynamics, dating pitfalls, fitting in, vulnerability, perseverance and standing up to fight for a brighter future. 

    The night concluded with the Los Angeles premiere of Where In the Hell, a buddy roadtrip “traumedy” about a prop master whose trip with her girlfriend is interrupted and a struggling actor on his way to an audition. The film brings heart and a grounded approach to existential turmoil.

    NFMLA showcases films by filmmakers of all backgrounds throughout the year, across both our general and InFocus programming. All filmmakers are welcome and encouraged to submit their projects for consideration for upcoming NFMLA Festivals, regardless of the schedule for InFocus programming, which celebrates representation by spotlighting various communities of filmmakers as part of the NFMLA Monthly Film Festival. This project is supported in part by the National Endowment for the Arts.

    Here are more details on the filmmakers and films.

    “DelMar” directed by Lucy Morales Carlisle

    About Lucy: Lucy Morales Carlisle is an Emmy-nominated, two-time Webby winner and a multidisciplinary filmmaker with over a decade of experience in digital media and post production. She holds a BFA from the School of Visual Arts and a MFA in Media Arts from The City College of New York. As an immigrant displaced by the Salvadoran Civil War, her work explores themes of identity and isolation.  Lucy is passionate about telling stories that resonate with the Latine community, focusing on women and culture.

    About “DelMar”: A female surfer navigates life between a rural beach town in El Salvador and Maryland, where she goes to live with a mother she has never met. 

    Watch the NFMLA interview with Lucy Morales Carlisle, director of “DelMar”:

    “Wabi-Sabi” directed by Josephine Green Zhang

    About Josephine: Josephine is passionate about stories of duality that offer hope to underdogs, outsiders, and misfits while humorously critiquing them. A master of tone, she enjoys bending genres and crafting modern love stories that explore themes of friendship, community, romance, justice, and self-acceptance. She is an alumna of UCLA’s Film Program, Film Independent’s Project Fellowship, UCB’s improv and sketch program, and the Universal Writers Lab. Josephine has written for Seasons 2 and 3 of First Wives Club on BET+ and Season 2 of Dollface on Hulu. Additionally, she has developed projects for Netflix, Disney+, Bound Entertainment, and CJ Entertainment.

    About “Wabi-Sabi”: When an insecure woman goes on a date at a traditional Japanese tea house, her best friend’s advice about white guys with Asian fetishes threatens to ruin her love life and her sanity.

    Watch the NFMLA interview with Josephine Green Zhang, director of “Wabi-Sabi”:

    “God & Buddha Are Friends” directed by Anthony Ma

    About Anthony: Anthony Ma is an award-winning Taiwanese American actor, writer, director, and voiceover artist born & raised in Arcadia, California. “Chinese Antique” (2009), a short film he wrote and produced, was screened at film festivals nationwide and received audience choice awards at the 168-Hour Film Festival and NFFTY. Elevator (2015), a feature he wrote and produced, was filmed in Los Angeles, New York, and Japan, garnering an Honorable Mention for Screenwriting at DisOrient Asian Film Festival. The latest feature he co-wrote, Staycation (2018), premiered at the final LA Film Festival and received the LA Muse Award. As an actor, he most notably guest starred in Scandal, S.W.A.T., and This Is Us. The LA Asian Pacific Film Festival awarded him Best New Actor for the rom-com indie feature Love Arcadia (2015). He was also a co-host on the HBO Max foodie reality series Family Style.

    About “God & Buddha Are Friends”: A young Taiwanese American boy falls into an existential crisis when a charismatic Christian pastor comes between him and his overprotective Buddhist mother.

    Watch the NFMLA interview with Anthony Ma, director of “God & Buddha Are Friends”:

    “Three Women Named Svetlana” directed by Natalia Boorsma 

    About Natalia: Natalia Boorsma is a Dutch/Serbian writer and director based in Amsterdam. “Three Women Named Svetlana” (2024) was her graduation film and was selected by film festivals such as Cannes Indie Shorts Awards, Shortcutz Amsterdam, Filmski Front and the Leiden International Film Festival. In the future she wants to experiment with a mixture of documentary and fiction.

    About “Three Women Named Svetlana”: On a sunny spring day, three women, all named Svetlana, are waiting at a small train station somewhere in the south of Serbia.

    Watch the NFMLA interview with Natalia Boorsma, director of “Three Women Named Svetlana”:

    “Where in the Hell” directed by Laramie Dennis

    About Laramie: Laramie Dennis got her start in New York directing and developing Off-Off-Broadway plays, most notably at the Flea Theater and Soho Rep. Her background in theater continues to inform her directing style. Where in the Hell, an offbeat road movie completed in 2024, marks her feature film debut as a writer/director. Other projects include Life on sMars, which earned her a spot at Through Her Lens: The Tribeca Chanel Women’s Filmmaker Program, along with a development grant from The Tribeca Film Institute, and Girl Pretending to Read Rilke, an Athena List finalist for 2025.

    About “Where in the Hell”: A pair of defectors from the crumbling L.A. film industry find themselves on an unlikely road trip to track down a missing girlfriend.

    Watch the NFMLA interview with Laramie Dennis, director of “Where in the Hell”:

    “So, That Happened” directed by Neha Aziz

    About Neha Aziz: Neha Aziz  is a Pakistani-born writer, director, film programmer, and podcaster living in Austin She currently works as the Artistic Director for Austin Asian American Film Festival, and as a Film Programmer for Big Sky Documentary Festival and the Cleveland International Film Festival. In 2021 she was named an iHeartRadio NextUP fellow. Her show Partition debuted in August 2022 and has been featured on Apple Podcasts, NPR, The Austin Chronicle, and more. In 2023, Neha was one of five recipients of the WAVE Grant from Wavelength Productions.Her short, “So, That Happened” is currently on the festival circuit. She was a writer for the PBS Digital Series Roots of Resistance, and she was just named a 2025 Unlock Her Potential Directing Mentee. 

    About “So, That Happened”: Sheila and Imran haven’t seen each other since college, but when Imran moves back to Austin, an opportunity arises for the pair to get acquainted once more.

    Watch the NFMLA interview with Neha Aziz, director of “So, That Happened”:

    “Sunflower Girl” directed by Holly M. Kaplan

    About Holly: Holly M. Kaplan is a writer and director of mixed Cantonese heritage born and raised in New York City. She was selected for NALIP and Netflix’s Latino Lens: Narrative Short Film Incubator for Women of Color to write, direct, and produce “Sunflower Girl.” Holly has worked as a Co-Executive Producer/Director’s Assistant on Pretty Little Liars: Original Sin and was a former apprentice to the late Independent producer/director Ben Barenholtz. She earned her BA in Film & Media Arts from American University. Currently, Holly is developing the feature-length script of Sunflower Girl with Stowe Story Labs.

    About “Sunflower Girl”: When a 13-year-old Chinese-American girl has the opportunity to go skateboarding with her crush, it comes at the cost of abandoning her little sister.

    Watch the NFMLA interview with Holly M. Kaplan, director of “Sunflower Girl”:

    “Bodies” directed by Luca Bueno

    About Luca: Luca Bueno is a Brazilian-born director, producer, and writer with a multicultural background, having lived in South America, France, and the U.S. At 15, he became Brazil’s youngest credited crew member on The Dreamseller (2016). His directing credits include “Bodies” (2024), “Luna” (2022), and “Skyward” (2025), with Luna earning multiple festival awards. Luca holds a Bachelor’s in Film Production and a Master’s in Directing from Loyola Marymount University. Now based in the U.S., he continues to create films while engaging with an audience of 120,000 on social media.

    About “Bodies”: Two LAPD officers respond to a disturbing call in an immigrant neighborhood, where Officer Alvarez confronts an unsettling truth that tests his duty, empathy, and cultural identity.

    Watch the NFMLA interview with Luca Bueno, director of “Bodies”:

    “Cartes” directed by Rhym Guissé

    About Rhym: Rhym was born to an Algerian mother and a father from Mali. She grew up in the Ivory Coast before moving to Louisiana and earning a writing degree.  Rhym has a prolific career in entertainment as an actress and director. She is a 2023 CDDP (Commercial Director Diversity Program) fellow and strives to create narrative features with female leads challenging the status quo.

    About “Cartes”: An undocumented Malian goes through great lengths to continue working for a non-profit organization she loves.

    Watch the NFMLA interview with Rhym Guissé, director of “Cartes”:

    “Unwavering” directed by Alexandra Hsu

    About Alexandra: Alexandra “Alle” Hsu is a Chinese American director/producer from Orange County, California. Alle has directed several short films: “Sophie” (HK),” “Our Way Home” (US), “Rencontres Paysannes” (France), “POP!” (US), and “Unwavering” (US), which have screened at over 20 festivals worldwide including having premiered at Oscar-qualifying festivals Austin, Foyle, and Bend, to name a few. Alle has been a part of prestigious programs SFFILM FilmHouse, CBS Leadership Pipeline, WIF Mentoring, Asian Women Empowered, Unlock Her Potential, Gold House Futures, KSW Interdisciplinary Writers Lab, and the CQNL Storylines Lab. FilmHouse supported her feature Queens, inspired by a family story around the 1960s New York Worlds Fair, which was also a Finalist for the SFFILM Westridge grant, a semifinalist in the Big Vision Empty Wallet Level Up Lab and a Finalist in the Giant Leap Accelerator.  At CQNL, she developed a feature about her great-grandmother, Zhang Youyi.  With a background in documentaries, she strives to tell stories truthfully and authentically, while shining a light on stories that have been left untold and that stimulate conversations. Alle received an MFA from NYU Tisch and a BA from Scripps College double majoring in Media Studies and Asian Studies.

    About “Unwavering”: Carolyn Kim joins a college student movement for Ethnic Studies in 1968. Inspired by real events.

    Watch the NFMLA interview with Alexandra Hsu, the director, and Christine Hughes, writer of “Unwavering”:

    “Lola” directed by Grace Hanna

    About Grace: Grace is a Filipino-American director who excels in genre filmmaking and world-building. Finding magic in the mundane is at the heart of the stories they tell. Their film, “Lola,” has screened at UTA x Gold House, AFI Fest, FilmQuest, and LA Asian Pacific Film Festival, among others, and won awards from the Television Academy, the Directors Guild of America, Imagine Entertainment, Adobe, and Indy Shorts International Film Festival, where they won the Directorial Debut Award. Their latest project, “”Halcyon Days,”” is sponsored by Film Independent and received Panavision’s NFP Grant. Grace was a semi-finalist for the Commercial Director Diversity Program and is a member of the Alliance of Women Directors. Their work has been shortlisted by Disney, Sundance Sloan, and Sony.

    About “Lola”: A thirteen-year-old science prodigy journeys into her grandma’s deteriorating mind to save one precious memory they have together.

    Watch the NFMLA interview with Grace Hanna, director of “Lola”:

    “Deep Into the Forest” directed by Xinhao “Violet” Lu

    About Xinhao: Xinhao “Violet” Lu is a Los Angeles-based Asian writer and director. His most recent film, Deep Into the Forest, premiered at 2024 Tribeca Festival and the 9th CAA Moebius Film Festival, and has been officially selected by lots of international film festivals. His dark comedy short film Red Man won Best Experimental film at the 2023 LA Shorts International Film Festival. His first short film Reunion Night was nominated for Best Film and Best Cinematography in “Mao” International Film Week in China. Prior to his MFA in Directing from the AFI Conservatory, he studied Finance at Tianjin University of Finance and Economics in China. He loves to explore the impact of the times on ordinary people and to speak out against social inequality.

    About “Deep Into the Forest”: A talented orienteering athlete makes an unexpected decision under the injury of his foot and the pressure of being pushed to compete at a national competition by everyone.

    Watch the NFMLA interview with Xinhao “Violet” Lu, director of “Deep Into the Forrest”:

    Main image: “Lola”



    Source link

  • 28 Years Later | Elio | Buckaroo Banzai (1984)

    28 Years Later | Elio | Buckaroo Banzai (1984)


    A woman in a black coat, a movie poster with a cartoon boy in a blue boat, and a gold-coloured medal.

    On Truth & Movies this week, The Rage virus rears its ugly head again in 28 Years Later, we check out Pixar’s latest, Eliot and finally, for film club it’s The Adventures of Buckaroo Banzai Across the 8th Dimension.

    Joining host Leila Latif are Fatima Sheriff and David Jenkins.

     

    Truth & Movies is the podcast from the film experts at Little White Lies, where along with selected colleagues and friends, they discuss the latest movie releases. Truth & Movies has all your film needs covered, reviewing the latest releases big and small, talking to some of the most exciting filmmakers, keeping you across important industry news, and reassessing great films from days gone by with the Truth & Movies Film Club.

     

    Email: truthandmovies@tcolondon.com

    BlueSky and Instagram: @LWLies

     

    Produced by TCO



    Source link

  • F1 review – speed is king, subtlety is…

    F1 review – speed is king, subtlety is…



    There’s no point in deny­ing it. No use pre­tend­ing oth­er­wise. By any rea­son­able met­ric or mea­sure, it remains a sim­ple and immutable truth: men are class. And yes, dudes do, in fact, rock.

    This is the most log­i­cal and self-evi­dent con­clu­sion to draw from F1: The Movie, a tur­bo-charged Dad Movie par excel­lence in which Brad Pitt’s star in an unrea­son­ably priced car proves that some­times the old ways are the best. Pitt plays Son­ny Hayes, a one­time For­mu­la One prodi­gy turned world-weary rent-a-wheel­man, who is lured out of retire­ment for one last ride by his old friend and for­mer team­mate Ruben Cer­vantes (Javier Bar­dem), now the own­er of the strug­gling APXGP team.

    Get more Lit­tle White Lies

    Hayes is brought in to men­tor the team’s num­ber-one dri­ver, Joshua Pearce (Dam­son Idris), a promis­ing rook­ie whose F1 career is in dan­ger of stalling before it has real­ly begun. But it’s not long before Hayes starts assert­ing his alpha male­ness all over the team garage, charm­ing the pants (lit­er­al­ly, in one case) off every­one from the mechan­ics to the press offi­cer to the most influ­en­tial mem­ber of the board. Every­one, that is, except Pearce, whose eager­ness to best his new de fac­to rival will have dis­as­trous con­se­quences – not just for him, but for the entire team.

    Direc­tor Joseph Kosin­s­ki and screen­writer Ehren Kruger, who pre­vi­ous­ly col­lab­o­rat­ed on 2022’s Top Gun: Mav­er­ick, are reunit­ed here to sim­i­lar­ly earnest, chest-thump­ing effect. Aside from a few brief glimpses into Pearce’s home life and a some­what laboured roman­tic sub­plot between Hayes and Ker­ry Condon’s Kate McKen­na (hailed as F1’s first female tech­ni­cal direc­tor), their script most­ly cuts to the chase – which is handy for a film whose run­time exceeds the aver­age length of an F1 race. Kosin­s­ki and Kruger know exact­ly what their audi­ence wants: dar­ing over­takes, late break­ing, sparks fly­ing, spec­tac­u­lar crash­es – and lots of it.

    Indeed, the mid­dle por­tion of the film plays out like an extend­ed rac­ing mon­tage, the action furi­ous­ly jump­ing from cir­cuit to cir­cuit – Spa, Mon­za, Las Vegas, Suzu­ka – as Hayes and Pearce begin steadi­ly work­ing their way up the grid. They are aid­ed by a chas­sis upgrade, devel­oped by McKen­na and designed to let them dri­ve through dirty air, and some good old-fash­ioned race­craft. The reck­less tac­tics and brazen skull­dug­gery employed by Hayes are car­ried off with a know­ing wink and a toothy grin, but are also plain­ly ludi­crous – to the extent you may end up park­ing your sus­pen­sion of dis­be­lief. Still, when the results are this thrilling, it seems churl­ish to nit­pick about such fan­ci­ful nar­ra­tive manoeuvres.

    Made with the full back­ing of the sport’s omnipo­tent gov­ern­ing body, the FIA, many key scenes were filmed dur­ing the 2023 and 2024 British Grand Prix events, with Pitt and Idris dri­ving adapt­ed For­mu­la Two cars in between actu­al prac­tice ses­sions. The footage cap­tured over those week­ends – par­tic­u­lar­ly the in-car, first-per­son POV shots – is aston­ish­ing. Unless you’ve dri­ven in F1 pro­fes­sion­al­ly, this is as close as you’re ever like­ly to get to the feel­ing of hit­ting 200 mph down Silverstone’s icon­ic Hangar Straight.

    Yet the FIA’s involve­ment also means that, even more than the strong smell of Brut, burnt rub­ber and testos­terone, the film has the unmis­tak­able whiff of an expen­sive, sani­tised PR exer­cise. Sev­er­al real-life big names from the For­mu­la One pad­dock – includ­ing reign­ing World Cham­pi­on Max Ver­stap­pen, sev­en-time champ Lewis Hamil­ton (who also has a pro­duc­er cred­it on the film) and team prin­ci­pals such as Mer­cedes’ Toto Wolff and Ferrari’s Fred Vasseur – appear in back­ground cameo roles as them­selves. Not to men­tion a num­ber of offi­cials and even a few state dignitaries.

    For added authen­tic­i­ty, the GP scenes are accom­pa­nied by broad­cast­ing stal­warts David Croft and Mar­tin Brun­dle, whose inces­sant expo­si­tion­al com­men­tary is like­ly to grate on sea­soned fans, but should help casu­al view­ers grasp the fin­er details of what is an extreme­ly tech­ni­cal sport. What is miss­ing – albeit under­stand­ably – is any attempt to grap­ple with the eth­i­cal con­tro­ver­sies sur­round­ing For­mu­la One, from accu­sa­tions of sports­wash­ing to con­cerns about its envi­ron­men­tal impact, work­place mis­con­duct, and per­son­al alle­ga­tions made against var­i­ous senior fig­ures with­in the sport and its par­ent organisation.

    All top­ics wor­thy of wider dis­cus­sion, but per­haps not in a film like this – where speed is king and sub­tle­ty is yel­low-flagged; where cold real­i­ty fin­ish­es a dis­tant sec­ond to the white-hot fan­ta­sy of a glob­al prod­uct that, as evi­denced by Netflix’s wild­ly pop­u­lar docu­d­ra­ma Dri­ve to Sur­vive, is engi­neered to con­tin­u­ous­ly fuel its own hype machine. If you’re look­ing for a seri­ous win­dow into the high-stakes, cut­throat world of For­mu­la One, you cer­tain­ly won’t find it here. So stick on that Fleet­wood Mac CD, grab those vin­tage Dun­hill avi­a­tors, and strap your­self in. As the late, great Mur­ray Walk­er used to say – go, go, go, go!

    To keep cel­e­brat­ing the craft of film, we have to rely on the sup­port of our mem­bers. Join Club LWLies today and receive access to a host of benefits.





    Source link

  • Temporal Sensibilities: Queering timelines and nostalgia

    Temporal Sensibilities: Queering timelines and nostalgia


    Two people in casual clothes, one wearing a red top, chatting outdoors; people sitting at tables indoors, some playing musical instruments.

    In collaboration with the Queer East Film Festival, our second pair from the Emerging Critics cohort offer their thoughts on this year’s programme.

    This is the second of three pieces published in collaboration with Queer East Film Festival, whose Emerging Critics project brought together six writers for a programme of mentorship throughout the festival.

    Yuki Yoshikawa

    Dear Pear,

    How was your experience at this year’s Queer East Film Festival? We ran into each other at a few screenings, didn’t we? Even though we were in the same space watching the same films, I’m sure our experiences were different.

    I had the opportunity to watch some repertory Taiwanese films, ranging from the 1980s to the 2000s. Among them, I found the double bill screening of Jo-Fei Chen’s Where Is My Love? and Incidental Journey especially beautiful. I’ve always been drawn to older films. There’s something about the slightly rough quality of the footage, the film’s wear and tear, and the bluish tint that captivates me. The occasional sound of the film’s scratches, like something is being set afire, adds a peculiar charm to the movie, as if it were a background track. Of course, my fascination doesn’t just stem from the film being physically old. There’s something nostalgic in the streets, landscapes, the demeanor of a person, and the relationships between characters that are depicted in the movie. While watching these films, I asked myself, why do I feel nostalgic for something I’ve never experienced? I’ve only been to Taiwan once, in the late 2010s, as a tourist. It seems like this nostalgic feeling that arises when watching these films has nothing to do with my own personal experiences.

    I’m also interested in the queer people from that time. I can’t help but feel a sense of melancholy. In Where Is My Love?, the film portrays the romantic relationship between Ko, the protagonist who resists coming out as gay, and his openly gay friend, Pierre. In Incidental Journey, we see two lesbian characters: Ching, a woman who travels across Taiwan after breaking up with her girlfriend, and Hsiang, a lonely artist whose past lover married a man. After running into each other by chance, the two  stay at the house of Hsiang’s past lover. Their evolving feelings and the growing attraction between them left a strong impression on me. Both these films delicately portray the struggles and emotions of queer people at the time, through depicting experiences of coming out, heartbreak, finding a partner, and deciding where and how to live. I imagine these issues must have weighed even more heavily on them back then than they might do now. It must have been incredibly difficult to search for a way to live without social acceptance. Watching these films, I feel as though I’ve been touched by the characters’ pain and lived experiences, which I’m now carrying with me. It feels like cinema enables the past and the present to connect through time.

    A young East Asian man wearing a blue shire with a white sweater around his shoulders stands on a street with an uncertain expression.

    Even though the LGBTQIA+ movement was gaining momentum in Taiwan around the 90s, that still wasn’t an era when queers were socially accepted. However, it’s certain that gay, lesbian, transgender, and queer people did exist. Through cinema, we feel their very existence. It doesn’t matter that the stories depicted in these films are fictional. Somehow, they transform into a memory that’s not quite my own, but still resurfaces within me.

    In one scene in Where Is My Love?, a young gay man sits in a dimly lit study, delicately holding a cigarette between his fingers as he concentrates on his writing under the glow of a banker’s lamp. Another young man gazes at him wistfully. The camera captures each of them at eye level, aligning with their perspectives. Their gazes and expressions reach us across the screen and through time. Even if this is a fictional story or comes from a past that doesn’t belong to me, queer memories continue to speak to us as nostalgia.

    In Incidental Journey, an artist is captivated by a free-spirited and alluring woman standing by the riverside. From a short distance, Hsiang finds herself sketching the woman. Framed by the stillness of the mountains, we watch the scene from afar, tracing the distance between the two. I felt as if this was a landscape I wanted to remember. The film is, of course, a fantasy, and I’ve never actually seen this place. But Incidental Journey painted a quiet, inner landscape in me, like a memory I carry in my mind. Perhaps watching films allows queers, each with their own histories and experiences, to create such pockets of memory within themselves.

    Queer fantasies created by film blur the lines between past and present, disrupt the flow of time, and mix reality with fiction, ultimately constructing a romantic past for queer people. These films offer us something beyond mere visual stories. Through the characters’ pain, their joy, and the time they lived through, we can experience an imaginary history. This is the power of nostalgia that transcends time and space, allowing us to reaffirm our existence as queer individuals.

    Two young East Asian adults, a man and a woman, sit close together in a grassy field. The woman has her arm around the man's shoulder.

    Pear Nuallak

    Dear Yuki,

    I remember when your hands described time on the pub table soon after we met for the first time. You said, “People think time is like this,” sliding your index finger forward. By considering queer time, we understand the potential of being temporally wayward: time can “drag on” because of societal pressure to live a straight and narrow life, so queering time can mean finding our own winding path. Or maybe time itself can become drag – material for destabilising performance.  

    History became burlesque in An Ass-Shaped Butterfly. Part of Queer East Expanded, this performance-lecture by film scholar Misha Zakharov was followed by a rare screening of Vocal Parallels, directed by Rustam Khamdamov. Zakharov, who self-describes as “russian-Korean” with a lowercase ‘r’ with a decolonial intention, offered a queer speculative reading of Erik Kurmangaliev, a Kazakh tenor who flourished in newly post-Soviet Russia. 

    Zakharov’s playful inquiry and careful research encouraged my reading of Vocal Parallels as a biting satire of the Soviet film-concert. This art form introduced art to the masses by combining musical and documentary; Vocal Parallels turns it into a surreal cabaret that treats Soviet cultural history like a dress-up box. Our host for this film-concert is Russian actor Renata Litvinova. With her ultra-femme Soviet retro style and barbed quips, Litvinova introduces each act and explains the film-concert’s thin plot. “One soprano hates another soprano […] and the mezzo soprano hates them all,” she says. We follow opera divas engaged in rivalry, including Erik Kurmangaliev. Always in full drag, his dark, rich, gender-ambiguous voice weaves through the film. When he sings “Vanya’s Aria” from Glinka’s Ivan Susanin, he’s a “female” character in a “male” military uniform playing a boy’s role intended for a contralto, the lowest “female” voice range that overlaps with a “male” tenor. The film treats gender like it treats time – playfully.

    Because of Vocal Parallels‘ sweeping historic scale and ironic tone, we’re kept at a distance. In contrast, when I went to the UK premiere of Chu Ping’s Silent Sparks, I was struck by the close invitation to feel time pass alongside the main character, a young gay Taiwanese gangster called Pua. I was curious about this film because I’d been reading Jackie Wang’s abolitionist writing on time and imprisonment. The movie begins with Pua being locked into his prison cell. His scheduled mealtime – what Wang describes as “making time digestible” –  is spent silently.

    A blonde woman wearing black sunglasses, a headscarf, black gloves and a white fur coat.

    Silent Sparks gently observes how criminalisation shapes Pua’s daily life. Upon release, Pua resumes work as a casual porter and hired thug for his car-and-crime-dealing boss, generally disappointing his long suffering mother, Ru, a fortune-teller who insists he eats mee sua (wheat vermicelli) for 100 days to change his fate. Pua and Ru live next to the train tracks and cannot afford to soundproof their home, the compensation payment for his previous victim adding to their mounting bills. I thought of how Wang describes debt as foreclosing people’s futures, with incarceration as “temporal punishment.”  The film’s slow pace, along with tunnelling compositions and rhythmic lines of city infrastructure, create the feeling of confinement outside prison walls.

    Pua’s refusal of food outside prison marks his general lack of appetite for life. The only thing Pua desires with single-minded focus is Mi-Ji, who seemingly remains cold to Pua despite the passion they once shared in prison. Pua and Mi-Ji are employed by the same crime boss; as their relationship rekindles, their work becomes more risky. Near the end of the film, when Pua decides to up the stakes in his pursuit of love, he finally eats his mother’s mee sua, which failed to change his fortune but sustains him when he makes a life-altering decision in his pursuit of queer love.

    Queerness and time create different layers and paths in each of these films. Where Vocal Parallels views the breadth of time as a camp spectacle, Silent Sparks shows how the main character tries to exert his will over time. In the closing scene, we flash back to a moment where Pua seems content with himself: hitching a ride on a motorised warehouse cart. We’re pulled along with him, journeying forwards and back at the same time. Although Pua is heavily implied to return where he was at the beginning of the film, his dedication to Mi-Ji refuses a conventional narrative.

    I’ve been thinking about how queerness isn’t always fun or affirming. These films link time with destruction, lingering inside the ruins of past cultures or individual lives shattered by violent systems. After watching them, I feel strengthened in my resolve that we can’t abandon ourselves or the people we love. Queers have always found each other in every timeline. 



    Source link

  • Before Sunrise and the ultimate intimacy



    If a charm­ing stranger asked you to get off the train with them in a for­eign city, would you? Let’s say this hap­pened in the sum­mer when you’re on hol­i­day, and you’re young and full of wild belief that mag­i­cal things hap­pen all the time – so why not?

    On 16th June 2025, known as Before Sun­rise Day’ among fans, it will be 30 years since a charmed encounter just like this took place on a train rolling into Vien­na. Before Sun­rise is an extreme case of the out-of-time encounter, as Jesse (Ethan Hawke) per­suades Céline (Julie Delpy) to get off the train they’re both on, to walk around togeth­er until morn­ing before part­ing ways. No one knows they’re doing this, and because it’s 1995 there are no text updates to friends from the loos, no loca­tion pins on social media, and not a sin­gle pho­to of them look­ing adorable in the vinyl shop or on the fer­ris wheel. But the most strik­ing thing about watch­ing Before Sun­rise today is how inti­mate it feels to wit­ness these two pay such focused atten­tion to each oth­er, nev­er break­ing the flow to doc­u­ment their aven­ture for their friends or even their future selves.

    Get more Lit­tle White Lies

    Star­ring a Gen X coun­ter­cul­ture dream­boat Ethan Hawke in his greasy-haired prime, along­side Julie Deply as an oth­er­world­ly and slight­ly neu­rot­ic Parisian, Richard Linklater’s 1995 film has long since become a cult clas­sic, even though it’s osten­si­bly a film in which noth­ing real­ly hap­pens. Two 20-some­things walk around Vien­na at night, just talk­ing. Maybe that’s the fan­ta­sy – to sim­ply have someone’s undi­vid­ed atten­tion. Even before mobile phones became so ubiq­ui­tous that Erykah Badu ser­e­nad­ed her lover with the words I can make you put your phone down”, hav­ing someone’s eyes on you like this would be pret­ty incred­i­ble. When­ev­er I re-watch this film, I’m so struck by the van­ish­ing beau­ty of the unin­ter­rupt­ed moment that it makes me want to hurl my phone – and every­one else’s too – into the ocean.

    I first saw Before Sun­rise in the cin­e­ma as a young teenag­er, before I’d had so much as a first kiss. It was the first time I’d seen a girl and a boy talk like that – it was a for­ma­tive expe­ri­ence, to put it mild­ly. I didn’t yet have strong ideas of what I want­ed my future to be, but this film made me feel like life would be an adven­ture, full of excep­tion­al peo­ple and enchant­i­ng moments, wait­ing to be expe­ri­enced on beau­ti­ful sum­mer evenings in Euro­pean cities. My VHS copy got warped with repeat plays. I only watch the film once a year now, but each time I’m pleased to find that not only does it hold up, but there’s a gen­uine sin­cer­i­ty that nev­er fails to brush away my cyn­i­cism. Even now, the hottest part is all that intense talking.

    But is that just because Jesse and Céline know they only have one night? So great was their youth­ful belief in the gen­eros­i­ty of the uni­verse, sure to send them end­less amaz­ing dates in the future, that they decid­ed not to exchange num­bers – they don’t want to spoil their rela­tion­ship by let­ting it fiz­zle out. Usu­al­ly the obsta­cle in the missed con­nec­tions” film genre is exter­nal – at least one par­ty is engaged or mar­ried (Lost in Trans­la­tion, Sleep­less in Seat­tle, Casablan­ca), there’s some med­ical issue like a coma or mem­o­ry loss (Eter­nal Sun­shine of the Spot­less Mind, For­ev­er Young), or time trav­el throws a span­ner in the works (The Lake House, The Time Trav­el­er’s Wife). The deci­sion to not exchange num­bers is hard to watch for any­one who’s been alive in the era of Tin­der, or indeed past age 22. But as a cin­e­mat­ic tool it real­ly cranks up the emo­tion­al inten­si­ty, and as the pre-dawn light fills the screen you can prac­ti­cal­ly feel the agony of the char­ac­ters, not want­i­ng the encounter to end. They’re des­per­ate­ly savour­ing every detail.
     





    Source link

  • 12 Shameful Movies That Glamorize the Devil

    12 Shameful Movies That Glamorize the Devil


    Shame, shame on the following movies for making the devil seem glamorous and cool.

    The Witches of Eastwick (1987)

    Warner Bros. – Credit: C/O

    In this adaptation of a John Updike novel of the same name, an unlikely coven of New England witches played by Cher, Michelle Pfeiffer and Susan Sarandon unwittingly open the door to the devil himself, played by Jack Nicholson. OK, technically he’s called Daryl Van Horne, but come on: Van Horne?

    The role finds Nicholson at his most endearingly devilish. He soon enters into complicated relationships with all three of the women.

    Shame! Shame!

    Devil’s Advocate (1997)

    Warner Bros. – Credit: C/O

    This 1997 melodrama finds Al Pacino playing the devil as high-powered lawyer John Milton, who, well, bedevils a promising new hire played by Keanu Reeves — as well as his innocent wife, played by Charlize Theron (above).

    Milton is immensely charming and seductive at the start, then gets more brutal and nasty as things descend into total chaos.

    Shame!

    Angel Heart (1987)

    Tri-Star Pictures – Credit: C/O

    Pacino’s pal Robert De Niro played the devil 10 years earlier, in the form of a ponytailed smoothie called Louis Cyphre who hires a private investigator Johnny Angel (Mickey Rourke) to track down a missing singer in this Southern Gothic/noir.

    Soon a young woman named Epiphany Proudfoot (Lisa Bonet) enters the picture, and things get very disturbing.

    De Niro’s decision to play Louis Cyphre as restrained and cautious is quite unsettling and effective. He’s perhaps our greatest actor.

    Shame!

    Also Read: The 5 Sexiest Movies About the Amish

    The Devil and Daniel Webster (1941)

    RKO Radio Pictures – Credit: RKO Pictures

    Walter Huston’s soft-spoken, diabolical Mr. Scratch (above) has an energy and charisma that seem impossible to resist. He rigs a trial against statesman and attorney Daniel Webster, as they take a wild and twisty tour through American history. It’s a challenging and ambitious story of what it means to be American.

    Shame on this film for ruining America’s wholesome 1940s image… and for glamorizing the devil.

    Oh God! You Devil (1984)

    From the trailer for Oh God You Devil. Warner Bros. – Credit: C/O

    The third film in the Oh God! series — following 1977’s Oh, God and 1980’s Oh God! Book II — finds the irresistible George Burns, who played God in the first two films, doubling up to play both God and his old nemesis, the devil. His mission: To buy the soul of a struggling rock musician.

    With all respect to Gracie, Burns and Burns also make quite the comedic duo.

    Shame on George Burns. Shame!

    The Prophecy (1995)

    Dimension Films – Credit: C/O

    Another handsome devil movie: This time Viggo Mortenson plays a philosphical, manipulative version of Lucifer, pushing buttons and trying to protect his own interests amid a complex war between angels and humankind. He’s a carrot-or-stick type of devil, charming with an invitation, but also happy to just drag people to the bad place.

    Also, is it us or does Mortenson’s devil look a little like DeNiro’s Louis Cyphre?

    Anyway: Shame!

    Also Read: 10 Sex Scenes Somebody Should Have Stopped

    Constantine (2005)

    Warner Bros. Pictures – Credit: C/O

    No one’s saying Peter Stormare’s version of the Satan is a nice guy, but he is pretty cool in Constantine, showing up as he does, barefoot in a white suit, slowing down time and walking through shattered glass like the mysterious, sultry star of a ’90s R&B video.

    Needless to say: shame.

    The Story of Mankind (1957)

    Warner Bros. Pictures, Inc. – Credit: C/O

    This very weird, ambitious courtroom drama finds Mr. Scratch — played by a beguiling Vincent Price, above — arguing before a Great Court of Outer Space that humankind is more evil than good. His magnificent cravat, needless to say, gives him an unfair advantage.

    Price was one of the earlier screen actors to figure out that a smooth-talking devil is scarier and more interesting than a raging one. You catch more souls with honey than vinegar, we guess.

    Anyway, shame.

    Bedazzled (1966)

    20th Century Fox – Credit: C/O

    Peter Cook is a swingin’ ’60s devil in the original Bedazzled, in which he offers seven wishes to a nebbishy lad played by Dudley Moore.

    The most amusing aspect of the film — and most stories about deals with the devil — is seeing how he’ll technically fulfill his end of the bargain, while making things infinitely worse.

    Given that this version of Bedazzled is best known for a seduction scene with Raquel Welch, someone wisely said: Hey. what if the whole movie were a big seduction? Which brings us to the next film in our gallery.

    (Oh, and also: Shame.)

    Bedazzled (2000)

    Hurley
    20th Century Fox – Credit: C/O

    The most glamorous of all movie devils, Elizabeth Hurley spends this superior remake of the 1966 Bedazzled tormenting the hapless Eliot (Brendan Fraser) while adopting a variety of amusing guises and costumes. She’s absurdly charismatic as a tech-savvy, high-fashion devil who uses computer programs to exploit her targets’ weaknesses.

    It may be Hurley’s best role — pitch-perfect as she is as Vanessa in Austin Powers: International Man of Mystery, she’s mostly playing it straight to Mike Myers’ Austin.

    In this one, she owns all the diabolical amusements.

    Shame! Shame! Shame!

    Little Nicky (2000)

    New Line Cinema – Credit: C/O

    With his prosthetic horns and pointy ears, Harvey Keitel is a watchable curiosity in this very broad, not-great Adam Sandler comedy.

    He plays the devil (often referred to as Your Evilness) as a hard-working, coolheaded, basically decent guy trying to hold everything together while juggling his difficult job and demanding dad (Rodney Dangerfield). Keitel, masterful actor that he is, glamorizes the devil by making him seem harmless.

    And also, the voice that Adam Sandler does throughout the movie: Shame!

    Enjoyed This List of Shameful Movies That Glamorize the Devil?

    Rear Window. Paramount. – Credit: C/O

    You might also like this list of 12 Rad ’80s Movies Only Cool Kids Remember. Or cleanse your soul with this list of 1950s Movies That Are Still a Total Delight.

    Main image: Elizabeth Hurley in Bedazzled, the inspiration for this whole gallery.



    Source link

  • First-Time Filmmakers Share a Secret Weapon: The Library

    First-Time Filmmakers Share a Secret Weapon: The Library


    Annapurna Sriram might not have made her debut feature Fucktoys — about a young woman’s psychic-guided journey through a colorful land called Trashtown — if not for her childhood library.

    “We would rent movies all the time, and my mom really preferred that we rented them from the Nashville Public Library because it was free, and weirdly there was a very strange collection of art house movies,” she said Friday at a Provincetown International Film Festival panel about first-time filmmaking.

    “So I saw Polyester and Pecker and Cemetery Man and But I’m a Cheerleader at a really young age, just based off the VHS boxes. And my parents kind of let us watch whatever we wanted from the library without worrying it, because they thought it was like educational.”

    The public library was educational not just for Sriram, but also for her fellow panelists, Jimmy director Yashaddai Owens and Plainclothes director Carmen Emmi. All three writer-directors talked about sharing an appreciation for public libraries that helped them become filmmakers.

    “Let’s take a moment and hear it for libraries,” noted panel moderator Eugene Hernandez, director of the Sundance Film Festival.

    For Sriram to reference John Waters’ 1991 Polyester and 1998 Pecker at PIFF was something of a full circle moment: Waters is a patron saint of the festival, who turns up for screenings, hosts wild fundraisers, and, on Saturday, will interview Ari Aster.

    Sriram, Owens and Emmi noted that in addition to resources like the library-connected Kanopy app, which lets viewers stream films for free, libraries offer a litany of opportunities for filmmakers, both in terms of resources and inspiration.

    Owens said he outlined Jimmy, a narrative that imagines the life of young James Baldwin in Paris, at the New York Public Library’s flagship location, the Stephen A. Schwarzman Building near Bryant Park.

    “You go to a library, see everyone with their phones off and kind of studious, in tandem, and it’s like a force, and it’s a spirit that we all pick up on. And it was really helpful for me just to go and mean business about what I wanted to do,” he told MovieMaker after the panel.

    Also Read: Say Yes to the Provincetown International Film Festival

    Emmi, meanwhile, recalled that he spent his early years as a filmmaker at the New York Public Library for the Performing Arts’s Dorothy and Lewis B. Cullman Center, located at Lincoln Center. The director, whose film is about an undercover cop ordered to bust men having sex in public places, would both read plays and watch recorded productions.

    “They have plays that are archived, and that’s how I learned how to write. Because a lot of the Broadway shows are so expensive now, when I moved to New York in 2018 I couldn’t really afford to go to the theater as much as I wanted to. But I would go to Lincoln Center and I would just watch plays,” he explained.

    The event was held at the beloved Provincetown entertainment and hospitality complex The Crown and Anchor, and if you needed a reminder that libraries are all about public service, you could walk a few blocks to the lovely and historic Provincetown Public Library, one of the few buildings in the world that advertises, prominently on its sign, that it offers public restrooms. Few things will garner so much goodwill in a beach town crowded with tourists.

    Given that it’s a library, that’s only the beginning of its services: It also offers a fantastic selection of books, including about Provincetown itself, a landing site for the Pilgrims that has since become an arts and LGBTQ+ mecca. And its “library of things” invites patrons to check out a wide array of usual gadgets, tools and sources of entertainment and education.

    But times being as the are, libraries are under attack — as one of the film’s playing at PIFF, The Librarians, reminds us. The award-winning documentary, from director Kim A. Snyder, profiles brave librarians standing up against book bans and other forms of censorship.

    “In other countries, this would never happen,” said Owens. “People don’t settle at all. We have to stop settling and see the collective force that we have.”

    Main image: The Provincetown Public Library. MovieMaker.



    Source link

  • Tornado review – tries a bit too hard to be different


    A person in a dark grey cloak holding a sword stands in a forested area with tall trees.

    John Maclean aims for Sergio Leone and Akira Kurosawa, but this 18th century samurai western leaves only a superficial impression.

    An entire decade has slipped by since the release of John Maclean’s debut feature, the frisky meta western Slow West, which, if nothing else, presented a savvy operator hankering to get his mitts dirty in the world of genre. His belated return to writing and directing retains a dash of eccentricity and a fondness for folding up and repurposing convention like it were a little origami bird, but this sadly feels a lot more like a roughedged first film than Slow West did way back when.

    Drawing on the macho, high-plains sagas of Sergio Leone as well as Akira Kurosawa’s games of psychological chess, Tornado follows a Japanese father-daughter duo trundling down the muddied byways of rural Scotland in the late 1700s and plying their trade as performers of a samurai-themed puppet show. She, named Tornado (Kōki), is bored with her lot, while he (Takehiro Hira), embraces the hushed nobility of this artisan profession.

    It’s not long before a hoard of gurning, grime-covered goons, each tooled-up with their own signature weapon, are chasing her across the landscape, because she pounced on the split-second opportunity to relieve them of two sacks of gold coins, the plunder from a criminal enterprise and en route to be divvyed out among them. The gang is led by Tim Roth’s Sugarman, who is basically Tim Roth were Tim Roth a poetically-inclined 18th century miscreant, who is at loggerheads with his son, Little Sugar (Jack Lowden), who wants nothing more than to get one over on his abusive pop and his pals. Maybe this snafu involving Tornado might be the right time to stick the knife in?

    You can see what Maclean is aiming for here, but it feels as if he’s carefully selected a few modest ingredients, and rather than combining them to concoct a subtle, gourmet dish, we have a few strong flavours that don’t really work in concert. The heist/chase mechanics are decent, but it’s all too schematic, and the twists are often stealthy plot devices rather than ways into the drama.

    On the atmospherics front, the film fares much better, with Robbie Ryan’s cinematography drawing out an autumnal haze of the spartan landscape, and some lovely little folksy production design embellishments from Elizabeth El-Kadhi. Part of the story takes in an encampment of travelling players, and the design of the mobile lodging and painted signage is a joy. It’s just a shame that these elements have so little to add to the story.

    The real problem here is a script which favours bathetic proclamations over any real desire to get under the skins of the characters. Tornado herself as the feisty heroine is tragically one dimensional, and the only real tension in the film derives from the testy father-son relationship between Roth and Lowden. And even that comes to a head in a way that’s both anticlimactic and illogical.

    It’s laudable that Maclean wants to breathe new life into unabashed “B” material, but unfortunately the idiosyncratic touches have usurped rather than bolstered what should be robust, time-honoured noir framework, and we’re left with a film which leaves only a superficial impression and little sense of purpose.

    To keep celebrating the craft of film, we have to rely on the support of our members. Join Club LWLies today and receive access to a host of benefits.



    Source link

  • Protein review – nasty, funny, soulful

    Protein review – nasty, funny, soulful


    A close-up of a shirtless man with a bloodied and bruised face, his expression stern and intense.

    A gang of small-town drug dealing gym rats are set upon by a murderous stranger in this satisfying Welsh genre piece.

    There are worse films to be obsessed with than Shane Meadows‘ Dead Man’s Shoes, and that film’s blood-flecked paw prints are all over writer/director Tony Burke’s witty, Welsh revenge yarn, Protein. The film cheekily adopts its title from the supposed nutritional qualities of human flesh among the more desperate echelons of the body building community, as our hooded, monosyllabic protagonist, Sion (Craig Russell), is in town to take out some tinpot trash and then feast on their freshly carved entrails.

    On the sidelines is kindly gym worker Katrina (Kezia Burrows) who attempts to befriend the shell-shocked Sion, and while he very much remains a closed book emotionally, he does offer her a secret assist by butchering a chauvinist local lout who’s giving her grief. In fact, the horror/slasher element of the film is perhaps the least interesting thing about it, as Burke builds up an ensemble of characters who are all more than mere functional bit-players serving a hackneyed plot.

    For example, two drug-dealing goons who work for a smarmy local kingpin are secret lovers who have been forced to conceal their relationship due to the air of unreconstructed machismo that pervades their grubby little community. Similarly, the two cops investigating this rash of disappearances come freighted with their own traumas, and an initially frosty relationship eventually thaws into something that’s rather toughing for a film that, in the main, focuses on violence, bigotry, exploitation, humiliation and which household tools are best for administering pain to your fellow man.

    The link to Dead Man’s Shoes doesn’t begin and end with its angular loner with zero moral scruples when it comes to offing his targets. Burke injects a much-needed hit of parochial humour into proceedings, exemplified by Steve Meo’s hilarious, hapless Kevin, a wannabe wideboy who loves nothing more than to play dress-up Travis Bickle in his bedroom and have yelled arguments with his (always off-camera) mother.

    There’re no wheels being reinvented here in terms of tone or narrative, but it is a very solid genre runaround that is elevated by its occasional and welcome lapses into soulful introversion. It’s highly satisfying to see a filmmaker transition from a career making music videos and shorts to a work which expends time and effort to flesh-out all of its characters – even if that flesh might be eventually eaten by its cannibalistically-inclined antihero.



    Source link